S.No. 14 Regular List HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT SRINAGAR OWP 263/2014 c/w OWP 1550/2013 MOHAMMAD AMIN PALA AND OTHERS …Petitioner/ Appellant(s) Through: Mr. A.M. S. Rabbani, Advocate V/s STATE OF J AND K AND ORS. …Respondent(s) Through: Mr. Hakim Aman Ali, Dy AG Mr. Saqib Amin Parray, Advocate CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE JAVED IQBAL WANI, JUDGE. ORDER 03.03.2025 1. Upon coming of the instant petitions for consideration, it came to be pointed out by the counsel for the petitioners that the mutation no. 2102 dated 19.05.1986 came to be challenged by the petitioners’ father Ghulam Qadir Pala in an appeal before Additional Deputy Commissioner/Joint Agrarian Commissioner, Anantnag on 27.10.1988 and which appeal came to be decided on 01.07.2003 against the appellant i.e. the father of the petitioners herein resulting into filing of a revision petition before J&K Special Tribunal on 24.07.2003 which revision petition as well came to be dismissed on 07.11.2013 and that the petitioners herein challenged both the order of the Joint Agrarian Commissioner, Anantnag dated 27.10.1988 and order of the Special Tribunal dated 07.11.2013 before this Court in the instant petitions, however, during the pendency of the instant petitions, the petitioners herein came to know that the mutation No. 2102 supra had been wrongly attested by the concerned attesting officer, whereupon the said mutation came to be discarded. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioners in this regard would refer to annexure A-3 appended to the petition, a perusal of which signifies that the mutation No. 2102 has been rejected by the attesting officer having been wrongly attested on the basis of contradictory record. 3. In view of the aforesaid position obtaining in the matter, nothing survives for adjudication in the instant petitions, and under these circumstances, the petitions are rendered infructuous. 4. It is however, being stated by the counsel for the petitioners that the actual mutation which has been attested in favour of the respondents pertaining to the subject matter of land is 2100 which has been thrown challenge to by the petitioners before Joint Agrarian Commissioner, Kulgam. 5. Be that as it may, the instant petitions in view of above shall stand disposed of. (JAVED IQBAL WANI) JUDGE SRINAGAR 03.03.2025 “S.Nuzhat”