IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No.1739 of 2025 Date of Decision: 3.3.2025 _____________________________________________________________________ Vineet Kumar Sharma ……...Petitioner Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and Ors. …....Respondents Coram Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sandeep Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting? For the Petitioner: Ms. Vidushi Sharma, Advocate. For the respondents: Mr. Anup Rattan, Advocate Mr. Rajan Kahol, Mr. Vishal Panwar and Mr. B.C. Verma, Additional Advocates General and Mr. Ravi Chauhan, Deputy Advocate General. ___________________________________________________________________________ Sandeep Sharma, J. (Oral) Learned counsel representing the petitioner, on instructions, states that petitioner would be content and satisfied in case he is permitted to file representation to the competent authority for redressal of his grievance with a direction to the respondents to decide the same in a time bound manner. 2. Consequently, in view of the above, this Court without going into the merits of the case, deems it fit to dispose of the present petition with liberty to the petitioner to file representation for redressal of his grievance within a period of one week, which in turn shall be decided by the competent authority within ten days. Ordered accordingly. Needless to say, authority concerned while doing the - 2 - needful, shall afford an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner and pass a speaking order thereupon. Pending applications, if any, stand disposed of. March 3, 2025 (Sandeep Sharma), (manjit) Judge