16.12.2022 rpan/19 FAT 18 of 2017 Bimal Kumar Biswas – Versus – Chinmoyee Biswas None appears on behalf of the appellant. In spite of repeated directions the appellant had not taken necessary steps to put in the requisites. In view thereof, the appeal, being FAT 18 of 2017 is dismissed for default. (Partha Sarathi Chatterjee, J.) (Tapabrata Chakraborty, J.)