COCP No.2277 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA 146 UPINDER SINGH Vs INSPECTOR GAGANDEEP KAUR CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARKESH MANUJ Present: Mr. Mr. Gaurav Vir Singh Behl, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Gunjan Mehta, Addl. A.G., Punjab. HARKESH MANUJA, J. (Oral) 1. Learned Kaur, Vigilance Bureau, S.A.S. Nagar (Mohali) submits that the requisite statutory sanction in terms of Section 19 amended by Prevention of Corruption (Amendment) Act, 2018 as such the Investiga 2. In such circumstances, no cause survives in the present petition. The same stands disposed of. 3. Rule stands discharged. May 27, 2025 Atik Whether speaking/reasoned Whether reportable 2024 (O&M) IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH COCP No.2277 of 2024 (O&M) Date of Decision: UPINDER SINGH INSPECTOR GAGANDEEP KAUR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARKESH MANUJ Mr. S.S. Behl, Advocate and Mr. Gaurav Vir Singh Behl, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Gunjan Mehta, Addl. A.G., Punjab. **** HARKESH MANUJA, J. (Oral) Learned State counsel on instructions from Inspector Gagandeep Vigilance Bureau, S.A.S. Nagar (Mohali) submits that the requisite statutory sanction in terms of Section 19-A of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 as by Prevention of Corruption (Amendment) Act, 2018 as such the Investigating Agency is not proceeding against the petitioner. In such circumstances, no cause survives in the present petition. The same stands disposed of. Rule stands discharged. (HARKESH MANUJA) Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether reportable Yes/No IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH COCP No.2277 of 2024 (O&M) Date of Decision: 27.05.2025 ......Petitioner ....Respondents HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARKESH MANUJA Mr. Gaurav Vir Singh Behl, Advocate Mr. Gunjan Mehta, Addl. A.G., Punjab. State counsel on instructions from Inspector Gagandeep Vigilance Bureau, S.A.S. Nagar (Mohali) submits that the requisite statutory A of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 as by Prevention of Corruption (Amendment) Act, 2018 has been declined, ting Agency is not proceeding against the petitioner. In such circumstances, no cause survives in the present petition. The (HARKESH MANUJA) JUDGE Yes/No Yes/No 1 State counsel on instructions from Inspector Gagandeep Vigilance Bureau, S.A.S. Nagar (Mohali) submits that the requisite statutory A of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 as has been declined, In such circumstances, no cause survives in the present petition. The MOHMED ATIK 2025.05.27 19:18 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment