- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC-D:929 WP No. 105130 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH DATED THIS THE 20TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA WRIT PETITION NO.105130 OF 2024 (GM-POLICE) BETWEEN: S. R .PATIL SOCIAL CLUB (R) SY.NO. 61/4, RABAKAVI-BANAHATTI, TQ: RABAKAVI-BANAHATTI, DIST: BAGALKOT, R/BY ITS SECRETARY, SHRI MALLANAGOUDA S/O. RANGAPPA PATIL, AGE 27 YEARS, OCC: SECRETARY, R/O: NAGARAL, TQ: MUDHOL, DIST: BAGALKOT – 587 313. …PETITIONER (BY SRI KIRANKUMAR CHATTIMATH, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA, R/BY ITS SECRETARY TO HOME DEPARTMENT, VIDHANASOUDHA, BENGALURU – 01. 2. THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, NRUPATUNGA ROAD, BESIDE RBI NUNEGUNDALAPALLI, AMBEDKAR VEEDHI, BENGALURU – 01. VISHAL NINGAPPA PATTIHAL Digitally signed by VISHAL NINGAPPA PATTIHAL Location: High Court of Karnataka Dharwad Bench Date: 2025.01.22 11:00:43 +0530 - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC-D:929 WP No. 105130 of 2024 3. THE INSPECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, SUBHASH NAGAR, BELAGAVI – 590 001. 4. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, BAGALKOT 587103, DIST: BAGALKOT. 5. THE DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, BAGALKOT – 587 103. 6. THE CIRCLE POLICE INSPECTOR, RABAKAVI-BANAHATTI, DIST: BAGALKOT – 587 314. 7. THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, TERDAL POLICE STATION, TQ. RABAKAVI-BANAHATTI, DIST. BAGALKOT – 587 315. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI SHARAD V. MAGADUM, AGA) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO, ISSUE A WRIT IN THE NATURE OF MANDAMUS DIRECTING THE RESPONDENT NO.2 TO 7 NOT TO INTERFERE IN THE DAY-TO-DAY ACTIVITIES OF THE PETITIONER SOCIAL CLUB SY.NO. 61/4, RABAKABI, TQ RABAKAVI-BANAHATTI, DIST BAGALKOT AND ETC., THIS WRIT PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: - 3 - NC: 2025:KHC-D:929 WP No. 105130 of 2024 ORAL ORDER (PER: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA) The petitioner is before this Court seeking a direction by issuance of a writ in the nature of mandamus directing the respondents-Police to restrain from interfering with the activities of the petitioner-club. 2. Heard Sri. Kirankumar Chattimath, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Sharad V.Magadum, learned AGA appearing for the respondents. 3. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner – Club has not undertaken any such illegal activity for interference. He would also submit that the issue is covered by plethora of judgments rendered by this Court. Though the petitioner – Association is abiding with the terms and conditions as directed by this Court, the respondents - police are insisting to obtain license, which is contrary to law. - 4 - NC: 2025:KHC-D:929 WP No. 105130 of 2024 4. In the peculiar facts and circumstances of this case, I deem it appropriate to refer to the order passed by the Co-ordinate Bench of this Court in W.P.No.12241/2018, disposed on 27.03.2018, wherein it has held as follows: "3. The issue which has been raised in the instant petition has already been considered by this Court in W.P.No.30071/2014 dated 15.10.2014 (The Media N Members Club vs. State of Karnataka and Others) wherein the petition was disposed of with the following directions: (i) The petitioner shall install within a period of six weeks, CC TV cameras, at the places of access to its members and also at all the places, wherein games are played by the members. The CC TV footage of atleast prior 15 days’ period shall be made available by the petitioner to the jurisdictional police, as and when called upon to do so. (ii) The petitioner shall issue identity cards to all its members, which shall be produced by the members, when called upon by the concerned police, during the raids, surveillance, etc. (iii) The petitioner shall not allow any non-member(s) or the guest(s) of the member(s), to make use of its premises for the purpose of playing any kind of game(s) or recreational activities. (iv) The petitioner shall not permit any activity by any of its members, by indulging in acts of amusement, falling - 5 - NC: 2025:KHC-D:929 WP No. 105130 of 2024 within the definition of Sections 2(14) & 2(15) of the Act and shall not permit any games of chance as per Explanation (II) of Sub-section (7) of Section 2 of the Act. The members shall not be allowed to play any kind of games with stakes or make any profit or gain out of the game(s) played. (v) The petitioner shall put proper mechanism in place and shall ensure that no games are played in any unlawful manner by the members. If the jurisdictional police find the game/s played is/are contrary to any law and in violation of the settled practice, it is open to them to take action against the petitioner and the offenders, in accordance with law. (vi) The jurisdictional police shall have liberty to visit premises periodically and/or on receipt of any information about any unlawful activity being carried on in the petitioner’s premises. (vii) The respondents are directed not to interfere with the lawful recreational activities carried on by the members of the petitioner’s – Club/Association. (viii) It is made clear that this order would not come in the way of the jurisdictional police invoking the provisions of the Act and taking action in accordance with law, if the members of the petitioner is/are found to have indulged in any unlawful or immoral activities. This writ petition is also disposed of in the aforesaid terms.” - 6 - NC: 2025:KHC-D:929 WP No. 105130 of 2024 5. In the light of the issue standing covered by the judgment passed by the Co-ordinate Bench of this Court (supra), on all its fours and on the same reasons, the subject petition also stands disposed. Sd/- (M.NAGAPRASANNA) JUDGE VNP/CT-ASC List No.: 1 Sl No.: 198