HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 17976 of 2025 Court No. - 40 HON'BLE SARAL SRIVASTAVA, J. HON'BLE AMITABH KUMAR RAI, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Standing Counsel for the State-respondents. 2. This Court on 7.7.2025 passed the following order:- "1. The submission is that a Kharanja road was constructed by the Revenue authorities through the holding of the petitioner without any right. 2. In the representation dated 16.05.2025, the allegation is entirely different. It is alleged therein that certain private persons, with the assistance of the local administration, constructed a Kharanja road over the land of the petitioner. 3. Counsel for the petitioner seeks time to place evidence on record to establish that Kharanja road was got constructed by the revenue authorities and not by private persons. 4. Put up as fresh on 29.07.2025." 3. In pursuance of the aforesaid order, the petitioner was directed to produce relevant evidence to establish that the Kharanja road had been constructed by the revenue authorities over the land claimed by the petitioner. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner, however, has failed to produce any evidence in this regard. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Santosh Kukmar Tiwari Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Sher Bahadur Singh Ramnivas Pandey .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) 5. From the record, the dispute appears to be essentially of a private nature between the petitioner and private respondents. Such grievance cannot be adjudicated in proceedings under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. 6. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed, with liberty to the petitioner to avail such remedy as may be available to him in law. September 10, 2025 Sumaira WRIC No. 17976 of 2025 2 (Amitabh Kumar Rai,J.) (Saral Srivastava,J.) Digitally signed by :- SUMAIRA AQUIL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad Digitally signed by :- SUMAIRA AQUIL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad