WAZIR SINGH v. PRESIDING OFFICER INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL CUM LABOUR COURT PANIPAT & ANR
CWP/22944/2015 · 2025-08-28
Kuldeep Tiwari
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 64774 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 64774 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
(223)
Wazir Singh Presiding Officer, Industrial Tribunal cum Labour Court, Panipat and another
CORAM:
Present:
KULDEEP TIWARI
1.
hearing, no for the respondent. Further, perusal of the file reveals that petitioner has remained unrepresented since the year 2019. Similar i well. It is already 3.30 p.m.
2.
not interested justification in keeping the
3.
non-prosecution
August 28, 202 Manpreet
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
AT CHANDIGARH
Wazir Singh
Versus Presiding Officer, Industrial Tribunal cum Labour Court, Panipat and another
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE KULDEEP TIWARI None for the petitioner. None for the respondent No.2. **** KULDEEP TIWARI, J.(ORAL) The instant matter pertains to the year 2015. one had caused appearance on behalf of the petitioner as well for the respondent. Further, perusal of the file reveals that petitioner has remained unrepresented since the year 2019. Similar i well. It is already 3.30 p.m. and Court time is At this stage, this Court, can safely ed in pursuing the instant matter any longer justification in keeping the instant petition on board, indefinitely. Accordingly, the instant petition is prosecution.
2025 Whether speaking/reasoned Whether reportable
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CWP-22944-2015 Date of Decision : 28.08.2025
…Petitioner Versus
...Respondents
KULDEEP TIWARI
The instant matter pertains to the year 2015. On the last date of one had caused appearance on behalf of the petitioner as well for the respondent. Further, perusal of the file reveals that petitioner has remained unrepresented since the year 2019. Similar is the position today, and Court time is almost over. can safely presume that the petitioner is er any longer, and there appears no instant petition on board, indefinitely. Accordingly, the instant petition is dismissed for
(KULDEEP TIWARI)
JUDGE : Yes/No : Yes/No
On the last date of one had caused appearance on behalf of the petitioner as well as for the respondent. Further, perusal of the file reveals that petitioner has , as petitioner is here appears no dismissed for
MANPREET SINGH 2025.08.29 10:26 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this
order/judgment