KHUSHAL SINGH PARIHAR S/O SHRI SUNDAR SINGH PARIHAR v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CRLMB/2017/2025 · 2025-02-27
Anil Kumar Upman
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 6477 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 6477 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:8804] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 2017/2025 Khushal Singh Parihar S/o Shri Sundar Singh Parihar, Aged About 28 Years, R/o Vidhyadhar Nagar, Police Station Vidhyadhar Nagar, Jaipur. ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mohammad Aslam For Respondent(s) : Mr. N.S. Dhakar, PP Mr. Mamraj Jat HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPMAN
Order 27/02/2025
1. The instant pre-arrest bail application has been filed under Section 482 of BNSS. on behalf of the petitioner, who is having apprehension of his arrest in connection with FIR No.159/2024 registered at Police Station Sindhi Camp, District Jaipur (West) for the offences punishable under Sections 140(2), 309(4) & 352 of BNS.
2.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. He submits that there was money dispute between the parties & same has been resolved by them amicably. It is submitted that petitioner has joined the investigation. Counsel further submits that there are no criminal antecedents of the petitioner & custodial interrogation of petitioner is not required in this matter.
[2025:RJ-JP:8804] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-2017/2025]
3. Learned State Counsel opposes the bail application, however,
learned counsel appearing for complainant does not dispute the factum of compromise & he has no objection if this bail application is allowed.
4. Considering the contentions put-forth by the counsel for the petitioner and taking into account the totality of facts and circumstances of the case, especially the fact that dispute has been resolved by the parties amicably & petitioner has joined the investigation; absence of criminal antecedents, but without expressing any opinion on the merits/demerits of the case, this court deems it just and proper to allow this anticipatory bail application.
5. Accordingly, the anticipatory bail application is allowed. The S.H.O/I.O/Arresting Officer, Police Station Sindhi Camp, District Jaipur (West) in FIR No.159/2024 is directed that in the event of arrest of the petitioner – Khushal Singh Parihar S/o Shri Sundar Singh Parihar, he shall be released on bail, provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the S.H.O/I.O/Arresting Officer of the concerned Police Station on the following conditions:- (i) that the petitioner shall make himself available for interrogation by a police officer as and when required; (ii) that the petitioner shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to
[2025:RJ-JP:8804] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-2017/2025] the court or any police officer, and (iii) that the petitioner shall not leave India without previous permission of the court.
(ANIL KUMAR UPMAN),J GAUTAM JAIN /298