IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 214 CWP-16669-2018 Date of Decision: 14.01.2025 PRITAM LAL …..Pe,,oner Vs. STATE OF PUNJAB AND ORS …..Respondents CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK GUPTA Present: None for the peoner. Mr. Surya Kumar, AAG, Punjab. Mr. Sanjeev Soni, Advocate and Mr. Sarthak Soni, Advocate for respondent No.3. ****** DEEPAK GUPTA, J. (ORAL) There is no representaon on behalf of the peoner. It is noced that counsel for the peoner is taking this peon very casually. Earlier on account of connuous default of appearance on behalf of counsel for the peoner, the same was dismissed in default vide order dated 20.01.2020. It was later on restored on 28.02.2020. However, nobody appears for the peoner on 25.07.2022. Today, again nobody has put in appearance on behalf of the peoner. It appears that peoner is no longer interested in pursuing the present peon. Dismissed in default for want of prosecuon. (DEEPAK GUPTA) 14.01.2025 JUDGE pry Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No PRIYANKA 2025.01.14 16:21 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document