107 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-23646-2014 (O&M) DATE OF DECISION: 22.04.2025 OMBIR SINGH AND ANOTHER ......PETITIONERS Vs. THE STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS .........RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK SIBAL HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE HARPREET KAUR JEEWAN Present: Mr. Adarsh Jain, Advocate, for the petitioners. Mr. Ankur Mittal, Addl. A.G., Haryana with Mr. Pardeep Chahar, Sr. D.A.G., Haryana and Mr. Saurabh Mago, D.A.G., Haryana. Mr. Ankur Mittal, Advocate, with Ms. Kushaldeep Kaur, Advocate, for respondent No. 4-HSIIDC. ***** DEEPAK SIBAL, J. (ORAL) Learned counsel for the parties are ad idem that the issue raised by the petitioners through the instant petition is covered against the petitioners by the law laid down by a Constitution Bench of the Supreme Court in Indore Development Authority vs. Manoharlal and Others (2020) 8 SCC 129. In view of the aforesaid stand of the learned counsel for the parties, the present petition is dismissed. (DEEPAK SIBAL) JUDGE APRIL 22, 2025 (HARPREET KAUR JEEWAN) nitin JUDGE Whether Speaking Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No Nitin 2025.04.29 14:32 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document