URMILA JAISWAL v. COMPETENT AUTHORITY / DEPUTY LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER AND 2 OTHERS
WRIC/17779/2025 · 2025-07-09
Mahesh Chandra Tripathi, Vinod Diwakar
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 64758 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 64758 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:109887-DB Court No. - 29 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 17779 of 2025 Petitioner :- Urmila Jaiswal Respondent :- Competent Authority / Deputy Land Acquisition Officer And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Ashutosh Kumar Pal,Patsy David,Sagar Mehrotra Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Mahendra Pratap Hon'ble Mahesh Chandra Tripathi,J. Hon'ble Vinod Diwakar,J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, Shri Ambrish Shukla, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel for State respondent no.1, Shri Mahendra Pratap, learned counsel for the National Highways Authority of India (respondent no.2) and Shri Mohd. Azam, learned counsel for private respondent no.3.
2. The instant writ petition has been preferred for direction to the respondent no.1 to decide the representation of the petitioner dated 09.05.2022 and withhold the disbursement of the compensation till the decision is taken by the respondent no.1.
3. After substantial arguments, once we declined to entertain the writ petition in the light of the complaint, which was decided by the Competent Authority, Deputy Land Acquisition Officer, Maharajganj on 17.05.2025 (Paper book-58), learned counsel for the petitioner fairly states that the instant writ petition may be dismissed as not pressed, as the petitioner has already invoked civil proceeding, which is stated to be pending before the competent Court.
4. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed, as not pressed. Order Date :- 10.7.2025 RKP Digitally signed by :- RAKESH KUMAR PATEL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad