DEEPAK GAUTAM v. SRI MAHENDRA PRASAD AGARWAL AND ANOTHER
CAPL/2690/2025 · 2025-08-04
Neeraj Tiwari
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 64753 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 64753 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:131742 Court No. - 1 Case :- CONTEMPT APPLICATION (CIVIL) No. - 2690 of 2025 Applicant :- Deepak Gautam Opposite Party :- Sri Mahendra Prasad Agarwal And Another Counsel for Applicant :- Siddharth Khare,Sr. Advocate Hon'ble Neeraj Tiwari,J. Heard Sri Siddharth Khare, learned counsel for the applicant and learned Standing Counsel for the opposite party. Learned Standing Counsel for the opposite party has filed two compliance affidavits, which are taken on record. On the basis of affidavit, he submits that the order of writ court dated 29.5.2025 rendered in Writ-A No. 17941 of 2024 has been complied with as opposite party no.1 has passed an order dated 4.8.202, therefore, application has become infructuous. Sri Siddharth Khare, learned counsel for the applicant submitted that till date order of appointment has not been issued in terms of
order dated 4.8.2025, therefore, liberty may be given to applicant to approach the Court again in case appointment order has not been issued. Under such facts of the case, no further order is required to be passed and file is consigned to record. However, liberty is given to applicant to approach the Court again in case appointment order has not been issued in terms of order dated 4.8.2025.
Order Date :- 5.8.2025 Junaid Digitally signed by :- JUNAID AHMAD High Court of Judicature at Allahabad