Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 6474 (UTT)

IMRAN v. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND THROUGH SECRETARY, MINISTRY OF HOME AFFAIRS, U.K. DEHRADUN

ABA/371/2023 · 2025-01-09

Ravindra Maithani

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Anticipatory Bail Application No.371 of 2023 Imran and others ….....Applicants Versus State of Uttarakhand ….….Respondent Present:- Mr. Mohd. Alauddin, Advocate for the applicant. Ms. Manisha Rana Singh, Deputy Advocate General for the State. Mr. Pramod Kumar, Advocate holding brief of Mr. Raj Kumar Singh, Advocate for the informant Hon’ble Ravindra Maithani, J. (Oral) Applicants Imran, Nasreen, Amreen and Aaris Ali seek anticipatory bail in FIR/Case Crime No.315 of 2023, under Sections 498-A, 313, 323, 504 IPC and Section 3/4 of Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961, Police Station Laksar, District Haridwar. 2. At the very outset, learned State Counsel gives a statement that the applicant nos.1, 2 and 3 have already been charge-sheeted and applicant no.4 has been exonerated. She would submit that the witnesses have supported the prosecution case during investigation. 3. Insofar as, the applicant no.4 is concerned, since he has been exonerated, the anticipatory bail application stands disposed of accordingly. 4. Having considered the entirety of facts, this Court is of the view that the anticipatory bail application of the applicants Imran, Nasreen and Amreen deserves to be allowed. 2 5. The anticipatory bail application is allowed. 6. In the eventuality of arrest, the applicants shall be enlarged on bail subject to their furnishing personal bonds with two sureties, each in the like amount, by each one of them, to the satisfaction of the Arresting Officer (“AO”). In addition to it, the applicants shall also comply with the following conditions: (i) The applicants shall co-operate with the investigation. (ii) They shall not approach any witness in any manner, whatsoever. (iii) They shall not leave the country without prior permission of the concerned court. (iv) The applicants shall deposit their passports with the AO. The passport may only be returned by the order of the court concerned. In case, the applicants do not have passport, they shall give an undertaking to that effect to the AO. (v) The applicants shall also give an undertaking on (i), (ii) & (iii) above. (Ravindra Maithani, J) 09.01.2025 Ravi