Sl.No. 3 Court No. 35 G.S.Das 24.02.2026 WPA 22707 of 2025 Sabina Bibi -Vs- Union of India & Ors. Mr. Sandipan Das … for the Petitioner(s) Mr. Sirsanya Bandopadhyay, Sr. St. Counsel Mr. Tarak Karan … for the State-respondent(s) Mr. Narendra Prasad Gupta … for the Union of India Re Inadvertently, in the last paragraph of the order dated 25.09.2025, it has been transcribed as “Having considered that the execution case along with original case is pending for a considerable period of time, I direct the ADG, CID, West Bengal to depute a proper officer who can communicate with the Ministry of External Affairs for the appearance of respondent no.15 before the jurisdictional court.” The same is incorrect. It should be read as follows: “Having considered that the original case is disposed of and the execution case is pending for a considerable period of time, I direct the ADG, CID, West Bengal to depute a proper officer who can communicate with the Ministry of External Affairs for the appearance of respondent no.15 before the jurisdictional court.” This order be treated as part and parcel of the order dated 25.09.2025. Department is directed to incorporate the necessary corrections in the order dated 25.09.2025. Parties to act on a server copy of this order duly collected from the official website of the Hon’ble High Court, Calcutta. (Tirthankar Ghosh, J.)