Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 64731 (ALL)

NEHA PAL ASSISTANT UPNIRIKSHAK ANKIK BRANCH v. STATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

NA529/1750/2025 · 2025-07-07

Nalin Kumar Srivastava

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:107050 Court No. - 83 Case :- APPLICATION U/S 529 BNSS No. - 1750 of 2025 Applicant :- Neha Pal Assistant Upnirikshak Ankik Branch Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Janardan Yadav,Vivek Kumar Pal Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Nalin Kumar Srivastava,J. 1. This application under Section 529 BNSS has been filed with a prayer to direct the court concerned to decide the Sessions Trial No.83 of 2025, arising out of Case Crime No.258 of 2024 under Section 69 of BNS, Police Station Pallavpuram, District- Meerut pending in the Court of Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate-II, Gautam Buddh Nagar expeditiously within a stipulated period. 2. Heard learned counsel for the applicant as well as learned A.G.A. for the State. 3. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the applicant that the applicant is the informant in the present case, which is pending at the stage of framing of charge and the accused persons are applying delaying tactics and till date charges have not been framed in the matter. 4. I have considered the submissions and perused the entire record. 5. It reveals from the perusal of the order sheets that the matter is pending since 2022 and even charges have not been framed so far. The accused persons are applying delaying tactics in the matter. The trial court is expected to take strict action against the accused persons, who are trying to delay the trial of this case and even charges have not been framed on account of their delaying tactics. 6. In the circumstances, the Court concerned is directed to pass an order on the point of framing of charge in this case as per law within two months from the date of production of certified copy of this order before it. It is also directed that if the charges are framed all endeavours shall be made by it for expeditious disposal of the case, keeping in view the heavy work load in the said Court. 7. It is also made clear that the Court / Presiding Officer is not the only stake holder of the trial and disposal of a case, hence, besides the P.O. concerned, all the stake holders i.e. police and execution authorities, advocates, parties to the case, staff etc. are also made bound by this order and it will be their responsibility also to assist the Court in every manner for the expeditious disposal of this case. 8. With the above observations, the application stands disposed of. Order Date :- 8.7.2025//Fhd Digitally signed by :- FAHAD NIYAZ High Court of Judicature at Allahabad Digitally signed by :- FAHAD NIYAZ High Court of Judicature at Allahabad