HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 2398/2025 1. Krishnakant Saini @ Shaitan Singh S/o. Gandi Lal, (Deceased) Through L.R.S 1/1.Smt. Phoolwati W/o. Late Shri Krishnakant Saini, Aged About 72 Years, R/o. Plot No.4, Ajad Basti, In Frond Of Ambar Tower Sansar Chandra Chandra Road, Jaipur. 1/2. Smt. Poonam D/o. Late Shri Krishnakant Saini W/o. Shri Kamlesh Saini, Aged About 29 Years, R/o. Plot No.4, Ajad Basti, In Frond Of Ambar Tower Sansar Chandra Chandra Road, Jaipur. 1/3. Smt. Manju D/o. Late Shri Krishnakant Saini W/o. Late Shri Laxmi Narayan, Aged About 45 Years, R/o. Plot No.39, Mahaveer Colony, Near Triveshwar Mandir, Kartarura Fatak, Jaipur. ----Petitioners Versus 1. Smt. Laxmi Devi W/o. Late Shri Radakishan, (Deceased) Through L.Rs. 1/1.Daya Shankar Sain S/o. Late Shri Radhakishan Sain, 1/2. Jitendra Sain S/o. Late Shri Radhakishan Sain, 1/3. Ajay Sain S/o. Late Shri Radhakishan Sain, 1/4. Vijay Sain S/o. Late Shri Radhakishan Sain, All R/o. House No.9, Ajad Basti, In Frond Of Ambar Tower Sansar Chandra Chandra Road, Jaipur. 1/5. Rajni Sain S/o. Shri Suresh Sain, R/o. Nahari Ka Naka, Shastri Nagar, Jaipur. 1/6. Seeta Sain S/o. Shri Hari Shankar Sain, R/o. Mohallah Rui Ki Mandi, Agra, U.P. 2. Shri Vikas @ Kana S/o. Late Shri Ishwar Chandra @ Lala, Grand Son Of Late Shri Krishnakant Saini, Aged About 22 Years, R/o. Plot No.4, Ajad Basti, In Frond Of Ambar Tower Sansar Chandra Chandra Road, Jaipur. ----Respondents (2 of 2) [CW-2398/2025] For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Satya Pal Poshwal (through VC) For Respondent(s) : JUSTICE ANOOP KUMAR DHAND Order 25/04/2025 1. The instant writ petition has been filed against the impugned order dated 12.12.2024 passed by the Rent Tribunal, Jaipur Metropolitan-II, by which the application submitted by the petitioners for granting an opportunity to produce their evidence has been rejected. 2. Counsel submits that the evidence could not be recorded due to the reasons beyond control of the petitioners, but these facts were overlooked by the Tribunal while rejecting the application. Counsel submits that during pendency of this petition, the final order of eviction of the petitioners has been passed by the Tribunal, so under these circumstances, this petition has become infructuous. Counsel further submits that a liberty be granted to the petitioners to take all the grounds, which are taken in this petition, in the appeal before the Rent Appellate Tribunal. 3. In view of the above submissions, the instant writ petition is dismissed as having become infructuouns, with liberty aforesaid. 4. The stay application and all pending applications, if any, also stand dismissed. (ANOOP KUMAR DHAND),J KuD/25