Research › Search › Judgment

Patna High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 64705 (PAT)

Shivnandan Prasad v. The State of Bihar through the Collector,

C.Misc./448/2021 · 2025-01-21

Arun Kumar Jha

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS JURISDICTION No.448 of 2021 ====================================================== 1. Shivnandan Prasad S/o Late Mohan Gope Resident of Village - Mosma, P.S. - Warisaliganj, District- Nawada. 2. Vishundav Yadav S/o Late Mohan Gope Resident of Village - Mosma, P.S. - Warisaliganj, District- Nawada. 3. Siasharan Yadav S/o Late Mohan Gope Resident of Village - Mosma, P.S. - Warisaliganj, District- Nawada. 4. Naresh Prasad Yadav S/o Late Mohan Gope Resident of Village - Mosma, P.S. - Warisaliganj, District- Nawada. ... ... Petitioner/s Versus 1. The State of Bihar through the Collector, Nawadah. 2. The Anchal Adhikari, Warisaliganj. 3. Suresh Yadav S/o Late Ramraksha Yadav Resident of Sakpurwa, P.s. - Warisaliganj and District- Nawada. 4. Gautam @ Sanjay S/o Shashi Bhushan Yadav Resident of Sakpurwa, P.s. - Warisaliganj and District- Nawada. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Umesh Kumar Singh, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr. Birendra Prasad Singh, AC to SC-19 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN KUMAR JHA ORAL ORDER 6 21-01-2025 Record has been taken up on mentioning being made on behalf of the petitioners. 2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners as well as learned counsel appearing on behalf of State-respondents. 3. The petitioners are seeking relief against the administrative authorities of the State Government and apparently the petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India is not maintainable for the relief sought by the petitioners. Patna High Court C.Misc. No.448 of 2021(6) dt.21-01-2025 2/2 4. Faced with the situation, learned counsel for the petitioners seeks permission to convert the present petition into civil writ under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. 5. Permission is accorded. 6. Learned counsel for the petitioners is directed to convert the present petition into civil writ under Article 226 of the Constitution of Indian within two weeks. 7. Office is directed to extend all cooperation towards conversion. DKS/- (Arun Kumar Jha, J) U