Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 64701 (PNJ)

JASWANT SINGH v. STATE OF PUNJAB

CRM-M/29826/2025 · 2025-09-03

Vinod S Bhardwaj

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 218 CRM-M-29826-2025 (O&M) Date of decision: 03.09.2025 Jaswant Singh ...Petitioner(s) VERSUS State of Punjab ...Respondent(s) CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD S. BHARDWAJ Present :- Mr. Lakhwinder S. Mann, Advocate for the petitioner(s). Mr. Mohit Kapoor, Sr. DAG Punjab. ***** VINOD S. BHARDWAJ, J. (Oral) The petitioner has filed the present petition under Section 482 of B.N.S.S with a prayer to grant anticipatory bail to him in case bearing FIR No.101 dated 03.05.2025 under Sections 316(2) and 318(4) of BNS, 2023 registered at Police Station Tanda, District Hoshiarpur. Learned counsel for the petitioner inter alia contends that pursuant to the order dated 02.07.2025 passed by this Court, the petitioner has joined investigation and is no longer required for investigation of the case. Learned State counsel on instruction from the investigating officer, corroborates the said averment and submits that the custodial interrogation of the petitioner is not required for the purpose of investigation. Heard learned counsel for the parties. MANGAL SINGH 2025.09.04 10:39 I am the author of this document 2 218 CRM-M-29826-2025 (O&M) Since the petitioner has joined the investigation and his custodial interrogation is not required, the present petition is allowed and the interim order dated 02.07.2025 is made absolute. However, if required, the petitioner shall continue to join investigation as and when required to do so and shall abide by the terms and conditions, as laid down under Section 482 (2) BNSS. (VINOD S. BHARDWAJ) 03.09.2025 JUDGE Mangal Singh Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No MANGAL SINGH 2025.09.04 10:39 I am the author of this document