2025:JHHC:23676 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI C.M.P. No.133 of 2024 ----- Deo Narayan Mehta @ Chhotan Mehta, aged about 37 years, son of Late Deo Lal Mahto @ Lattu Mahto, Resident of Village-Lupung, P.O. Arandhir, P.S. Katkamsandi, District-Hazaribag. … … Petitioner Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand represented through the Commissioner, North Chhotanagpur Division, Hazaribag, P.O. + P.S.-Hazaribag, District-Hazaribag, Jharkhand. 2. The Commissioner, North Chhotanagpur Division, Hazaribag, P.O. + P.S. – Hazaribag, District-Hazaribag, Jharkhand. 3. The Deputy Commissioner, Hazaribag, having its office at Collectoriate Building, Hazaribag, P.O. + P.S. Hazaribag, District – Hazaribag, Jharkhand. 4. The Conservator of Forest, Hazaribag, P.O. + P.S.- Hazaribag, District-Hazaribag, Jharkhand. 5. The Divisional Forest Officer, Hazaribag, P.O. + P.S.- Hazaribag, District-Hazaribag, Jharkhand. … … Opp. Parties ------- CORAM : HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SUJIT NARAYAN PRASAD ------- For the Petitioner : Mr. Ranjit Kumar Tiwari, Advocate For the Opp. Parties : Mr. Rituraj, AC to SC-VI Ms. Deepika Jojowar, AC to SC-VI ------ Order No. 02/Dated 13th August, 2025 1. The instant Civil Miscellaneous Petition has been filed for restoration of writ petition being W.P.(C) No.4463 of 2017 which stood dismissed for default on 09.05.2019 due to non-compliance of the peremptory order dated 02.05.2019. 2. The reason assigned in the instant petition is that on 02.05.2019, the learned counsel for the petitioner failed to mark the list, as such, could not appear in the Court 2025:JHHC:23676 2 and peremptory order was passed to remove the defects. Thereafter, on 22.06.2019, the learned counsel for the petitioner came to know from the clerk that the peremptory order has been passed on 02.05.2019 to remove the defect but by that time the peremptory time granted to remove the defect had expired, which resulted into dismissal of the writ petition for default due to non-compliance of the peremptory order dated 02.05.2019. 3. It has further been stated that there was no deliberate fault or laches on the part of the counsel or on the part of the petitioner and it was due to inadvertence, the defects could not have been removed. 4. It has been submitted that the instant Civil Miscellaneous Petition has been filed for restoration of writ petition being W.P.(C) No.4463 of 2017 which stood dismissed for default on 09.05.2019 due to non-compliance of the peremptory order dated 02.05.2019 and if the same will not be restored, the petitioner will suffer irreparable loss and injury. 5. Learned counsel for the opposite parties has not opposed to such submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner. 6. This Court, after having heard the learned counsel for the parties, considering the submissions advanced by him and the reason assigned in the instant Civil 2025:JHHC:23676 3 Miscellaneous Petition, deems it fit and proper to restore the writ petition being W.P.(C) No.4463 of 2017 which stood dismissed for default on 09.05.2019 due to non- compliance of the peremptory order dated 02.05.2019, to its original file. 7. In view thereof, the writ petition being W.P.(C) No.4463 of 2017 is restored to its original file. 8. Accordingly, the instant Civil Miscellaneous Petition stands disposed of. 9. List before appropriate Bench. (Sujit Narayan Prasad, J.) Saurabh/