SUNIL KUMAR AND OTHERS v. UT OF J AND K TH INCHARGE S.H.O. POLICE STATION WOMEN KATHUA AND ANOTHER
CRM(M)/911/2025 · 2026-04-15
Rajesh Sekhri
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 647 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 647 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Sr. No. 172 HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU
CRM(M) No. 911/2025
Sunil Kumar and Ors. …. Petitioner(s)
Through:- Mr. Rajiv Kumar Sharma, Advocate.
V/s
UT of J&K & Anr. …..Respondent(s)
Through:- None.
CORAM : HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH SEKHRI, JUDGE
ORDER 15.04.2026
1. Statements of the petitioners and private respondent-complainant, at whose instance impugned FIR No. 13/2021 for offences under Section 498A and 34 IPC came to be registered, have been reduced into writing before learned Registrar Judicial of this Court, in the light of compromise (Annexure-II).
2. The complainant in her statement has stated that she has amicably resolved all the disputes and issues with her husband (petitioner No.1) and his parents and she has no grievance against them now. She has no objection to the quashment of the impugned FIR. She has been identified by her counsel Mr. Deepak Sharma, Advocate.
3. In view of compromise arrived at between the parties, present petition is allowed and impugned FIR is quashed.
4.
Disposed of with connected CMs.
CRM(M) No. 911/2025
2
6. Interim direction, if any, shall stand vacated.
(Rajesh Sekhri) Judge
JAMMU 15.04.2026 NEHA-1
Neha Kumari 2026.04.15 16:43 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document