Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 64697 (KAR)

SATHYAPPA @ SATISH S/O GUDDAPPA v. CHANDRASHEKHAR S/O SHIVAJAPPA CHANNALI,

MFA/101964/2014 · 2025-08-30

Ashok S Kinagi

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-D:11127 MFA No. 101964 of 2014 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, AT DHARWAD DATED THIS THE 30TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK S. KINAGI MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO. 101964 OF 2014 (MV-) BETWEEN: 1. SATHYAPPA @ SATISH S/O GUDDAPPA LINGADEVARAKOPPA, AGE: 17 YEARS, OCC: SHUFERRED, R/O: ARALIKATTI, NOW AT RAHUTANAKATTI, TQ: RANEBENNUR, DIST: HAVERI. SINCE MINOR REP BY HIM M/G AND NEXT FRIEND FATHER., SRI. GUDDAPPA S/O NEELAPPA LINGADEVARAKOPPA, AGE: 36 YEARS, OCC: COOLIE, R/O: ARALIKATTI, TQ: HIREKERUR. …APPELLANT (BY SRI. M.H. PATIL, ADV) AND: 1. CHANDRASHEKHAR S/O SHIVAJAPPA CHANNALI, AGE: MAJOR, OCC: BUSINESS, R/O: KADENANDIHALLI, NOW AT B.G.BANAKAR EXTENSION, JANATHA PLOT, HIREKERUR, DIST: HAVERI. R.C. OWNER OF THE VEHICLE BEARING REG NO. KA-17/N-2156. 2. THE RELIANCE GENERAL INSURANCE CO LTD V K KALBURGI SQUARE, DESAI CROSS, DESHPANDE NAGAR, HUBLI. 3. MR. ADARSHA S/O NAGAPPAGOUDA, KASHINATH BUILDING , VIJAYA RICE MILL, NEAR C.N ROAD, HOLEHONNUR, TQ: BHADRAVATI. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.N RAICHUR, ADV FOR R2, NOTICE TO R1 & R3 IS DISPENSED WITH) MOHANKUMAR B SHELAR Digitally signed by MOHANKUMAR B SHELAR Date: 2025.09.03 13:11:40 +0530 - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-D:11127 MFA No. 101964 of 2014 THIS MFA IS FILED U/S.173(1) OF MV ACT 1988, AGAINST JUDGMENT AND AWARD DTD:27.06.2013, PASSED IN MVC. NO.395/2012 ON THE FILE OF THE ADDITIONAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND AMACT AT RANEBENNUR, PARTLY ALLOWING THE CLAIM PETITION FOR COMPENSATION AND SEEKING ENHANCEMENT OF COMPENSATION. THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, THE JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK S. KINAGI ORAL JUDGMENT (PER: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK S. KINAGI) 1. Learned counsel for the appellant has filed a memo seeking withdrawal of the appeal. 2. The memo is placed on record. 3. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed as withdrawn. SD/- (ASHOK S. KINAGI) JUDGE RHR/- CT: BSB List No.: 1 Sl No.: 29