Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 64681 (KAR)

NAVEEN S/O BAPUSAHEB PATIL v. SHUBHA B

CCC/100118/2025 · 2025-08-13

S Sunil Dutt Yadav, Vijaykumar A Patil

Contempt Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-D:10188-DB CCC No. 100119 of 2025 C/W CCC No. 100118 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH DATED THIS THE 13TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2025 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.SUNIL DUTT YADAV AND THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIJAYKUMAR A.PATIL CIVIL CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 100119 OF 2025 C/W CIVIL CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 100118 OF 2025 IN CCC NO.100119/2025: BETWEEN: SMT. SHEETAL S/O KIRAN PATIL AGE. 64 YEARS, OCC. R/O. NO.768/31, 768/32, 768/33, GIRNAR HILL HINDWADI, BELAGAVI 590001. …COMPLAINANT (BY SRI. S.S. BETURMATH, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. SHUBHA B. THE COMMISSIONER, CITY MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, SUBHASH NAGAR, BELAGAVI 590001. 2. MOHAMMAD ROSHAN THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, BELAGAVI DISTRICT, BELAGAVI 590001. …ACCUSED 3. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA BY ITS PRL. SECRETARY, URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, VIKAS SOUDHA, BENGALURU 560001. …PROFORMA RESPONDENT (BY SRI. CHETAN MUNNOLI, ADVOCATE FOR A1; NOTICE TO A2 IS SERVED; SRI. V.S. KALASURMATH, AGA FOR R3) THIS CCC IS FILED UNDER SECTIONS 11 AND 12 OF THE CONTEMPT OF COURTS ACT, 1971, R/W. ARTICLE 215 OF CONSTITUTION OF INDIA,1950, PRAYING TO TAKE COGNIZANCE OF Digitally signed by VINAYAKA B V Location: High Court of Karnataka, Dharwad Bench - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-D:10188-DB CCC No. 100119 of 2025 C/W CCC No. 100118 of 2025 THE OFFENCE OF THE ACTS OF ACCUSED UNDER THE CONTEMPT OF COURT ACT 1971 FOR WILLFUL DISOBEDIENCE OF ORDER DATED 17/08/2023 IN W.P.NO.100653/2023 (LA-RES), VIDE ANNEXURE-A AND PUNISH THE ACCUSED FOR THE OFFENCE PUNISHABLE UNDER THE CONTEMPT OF COURTS ACT, 1971 & ETC. IN CCC NO.100119/2025: BETWEEN: NAVEEN S/O BAPUSAHEB PATIL AGE. 61 YEARS, OCC. R/O. NO.768/31, 768/32, 768/33, GIRNAR HILL HINDWADI, BELAGAVI 590001. …COMPLAINANT (BY SRI. S.S. BETURMATH, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. SHUBHA B. THE COMMISSIONER, CITY MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, SUBHAS NAGAR, BELAGAVI 590001. 2. MOHAMMAD ROSHAN THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, BELAGAVI DISTRICT, BELAGAVI 590001. …ACCUSED 3. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA BY ITS PRL. SECRETARY, URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, VIKAS SOUDHA, BENGALURU 560001. …PROFORMA RESPONDENT (BY SRI. CHETAN MUNNOLI, ADVOCATE FOR A1; NOTICE TO A2 IS SERVED; SRI. V.S. KALASURMATH, AGA FOR R3) THIS CCC IS FILED UNDER SECTIONS 11 AND 12 OF THE CONTEMPT OF COURTS ACT, 1971, R/W. ARTICLE 215 OF CONSTITUTION OF INDIA,1950, PRAYING TO TAKE COGNIZANCE OF THE OFFENCE OF THE ACTS OF ACCUSED UNDER THE CONTEMPT OF COURT ACT 1971 FOR WILLFUL DISOBEDIENCE OF ORDER DATED 17/08/2023 IN W.P.NO.100649/2023 (LA-RES), VIDE ANNEXURE-A AND PUNISH THE ACCUSED FOR THE OFFENCE PUNISHABLE UNDER THE CONTEMPT OF COURTS ACT, 1971 & ETC. THESE CONTEMPT PETITIONS COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-D:10188-DB CCC No. 100119 of 2025 C/W CCC No. 100118 of 2025 CORAM: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.SUNIL DUTT YADAV AND THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIJAYKUMAR A.PATIL ORAL ORDER (PER: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.SUNIL DUTT YADAV) The present proceedings have been initiated complaining disobedience of the order passed in WP No.100649/2023 and 100653/2023. The accused have filed a memo which reads as under; MEMO The Accused No.1 submits as under; It is submitted that, the City Corporation, Belagavi has purchased the property measuring 85.25 Sq. Mtrs out of 1013.62 Sp. Mtr in CTS No.2791/3 from Smt. Sheetal W/o. Kiran Patil (Complainant in CCC No.100119/2025) and property measuring 171.12135050 Sq. Mtr out of 1190.22 Sq. Mtr in CTS No.2791/1 from Complainants in CCC No.100118/2025, in terms of two separate registered Sale Deeds dated 28.07.2025. True Copies of Sale Deed dated 28.07.2025 executed by Smt. Sheetal W/o. Kiran Patil in favour of City Corporation, Belagavi is produced as per Document No.1 and Sale Deed dated 28.07.2025 executed by Naveen S/o. Bapusaheb Patil & Tanuja Bapusaheb Patil in favour of City Corporation, Belagavi is produced as per Document No.2. In view of the above, the grievance of the Complainants does not survive for consideration. Hence, it is most humbly prayed that this Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to drop the above contempt proceedings, in the interest of justice. It is further submitted that the sale deed has been executed by the petitioner in favour of the corporation. - 4 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-D:10188-DB CCC No. 100119 of 2025 C/W CCC No. 100118 of 2025 In light of the same, as grievance is considered and complaint is redressed, the proceedings are dropped. Sd/- (S.SUNIL DUTT YADAV) JUDGE Sd/- (VIJAYKUMAR A.PATIL) JUDGE PJ LIST NO.: 1 SL NO.: 30