- 1 - IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 53 WRIT PETITION NO. 950 OF 2025 MAULANA AZAD BAHUUDDESHIYA SEVABHAVI SANSTHA THR ITS PRINCIPAL ASLAM I SHAIKH VERSUS THE UNION OF INDIA THR SECRETORY AND OTHERS Mr.D.B.Pokale, Advocate for the petitioner. Ms.S.S.Jadhav, AGP for the respondent/State. Mr.R.R.Bangar, Standing Counsel for respondent No.1. Mr.P.D.Suryawanshi, Advocate for respondent No.5. ( CORAM : MANGESH S. PATIL AND PRAFULLA S. KHUBALKAR, JJ. ) DATE : JANUARY 20, 2025 PER COURT : 1. The petitioner/school claiming to have admitted students sent to them under the provisions of the RTE Act, is seeking reimbursement in the light of Section 12 of the Right of Children to Free and Compulsory Education Act, 2009. 2. We have heard the learned Advocate for the petitioner, the learned AGP, the learned Advocate Mr.Bangar for respondent No.1 and Mr.Suryawanshi for respondent No.5. khs/Jan.2025/950 2025:BHC-AUG:1621-DB - 2 - 3. The petition is disposed of directing respondent No.5 to scrutinize the petitioner’s proposal and if he is found entitled to have the reimbursement, process it as expeditiously as possible so as to reimburse him, in any case within 6 weeks. If the petitioner is found entitled to have it, respondent Nos. 2 and 4 shall reimburse it within 6 weeks thereafter. ( PRAFULLA S. KHUBALKAR, J.) ( MANGESH S. PATIL, J.) khs/Jan.2025/950