Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.8708 of 2025 ====================================================== Anandi Devi w/o Shri Yugal Prasad, Residence of Village Panchu, PO and PS - Hisua, District - Nawada ... ... Petitioner/s Versus
1. The State of Bihar through the Additional Chief Secretary, Department of Revenue and Land Reforms, Government of Bihar, Patna
2. The Additional Chief Secretary, Dept. of Revenue and Land Reforms, Govt of Bihar, Patna
3. The Commissioner, Magadh Division, Gaya
4. The Collector, Nawada
5. The District Land Acquisition Officer, Nawada.
6. The Bihar State Road Development Corporation Limited (BSRDCL), Near Patna Airport, P.S. AIRPORT, Sheikhpura, Patna 8000014, through the Chairman. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Rajeev Kumar, Adv. For the Respondent/s : Mr. Nalin Vilochan Tiwary, Adv. For the Resp.6 : Mr. P.K. Sahi, Senior Adv. : Mr. Manish Dhari Singh, Adv. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY ORAL ORDER 4 22-06-2026 Heard the Parties
2. The present writ petition has been preferred for the following relief/s:
“i. To make payment of the award amount of Rs 14,16,514/- in lieu of the acquisition of the land bearing plot no. 398 khata no. 3, Revenue thana. 105, Mauja Barat, Circle Mascor, Nawada; ii. To pay interest @10% of the amount
Patna High Court CWJC No.8708 of 2025(4) dt.22-06-2026 2/2 for
holding
compensation
amount, notwithstanding, the order of the Commissioner, Magadh Division, Gaya pursuant to wilful abstention to take part in the proceedings; iii. To grant such other reliefs in the facts and circumstances of the case.”
3. Pursuant to the last order dated 28.04.2026, a supplementary counter affidavit has been filed on behalf of the respondent nos. 4 and 5 duly signed by the Additional District Land Acquisition Officer, Nawada which shows that Rs. 14,17,000/- has been credited in the account of the petitioner on 28.04.2026 itself.
4. This Court is convinced that the claim of the petitioner has been taken care of and payment made. If the petitioner still has any grievance, the forum is/are always available to her/them.
5. The writ petition stands disposed of with the aforesaid observation.
munindra/ (Rajiv Roy, J) U