Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 6467 (CHH)

RAKESH KUMAR DHRUW v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

WPS/790/2025 · 2025-01-29

Shri Amitendra Kishore Prasad

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2025:CGHC:5163 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 790 of 2025 Rakesh Kumar Dhruw S/o Late Shri A.R. Dhruw Aged About 42 Years Posted As Under Secretary, Higher Education Department, Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralaya, Nava Raipur, Atal Nagar, District Raipur (Chhattisgarh) ... Petitioner versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, General Administrative Department, Mahanadi Bhawan, Naya Raipur, Atal Nagar, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh 2 - Chhattisgarh State Election Commission Through Chief Electoral Officer, Election Office, Sector 19, North Block, Atal Nagar, Nava Raipur, District Raipur (Chhattisgarh) 3 - Secretary Higher Education Department, Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralaya, Atal Nagar, District Raipur Chhattisgarh 4 - Collector District Balrampur Ramanujganj (Chhattisgarh) ... Respondents (Cause title taken from Case Information System) For Petitioner : Shri Anup Majumdar, Advocate. For State/respondents No.1, 3 & 4 : Shri Suyashdhar Badgaiya, Dy.G.A. For respondent No.2 : Shri Venketesh Pandey, Advocate appears on advance copy on behalf of Shri R.S. Marhas, Advocate. GOURI MUDALIAR Digitally signed by GOURI MUDALIAR Date: 2025.02.03 11:56:35 +0530 2 Hon’ble Shri Justice Amitendra Kishore Prasad Order on Board 29/01/2025 1. Heard Shri Anup Majumdar, learned counsel for the petitioner, Shri Suyashdhar Badgaiya, learned Deputy Government Advocate for the State and Shri Venketesh Pandey, learned counsel appearing on behalf of Shri R.S. Marhas, Advocate for respondent No.2. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that after filing of this petition, the respondent/authorities are proposing to cancel the transfer order and the petitioner has been given assurance, as such, at this stage, he do want to press this petition, however he is seeking liberty to file afresh, in case, exigency arises. 3. With this observation, the petition stands disposed of. However, the petitioner is at liberty to file afresh, in case, exigency arises. Sd/- (Amitendra Kishore Prasad) Judge gouri