330 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA VIKESH SATIJA STATE OF HARYANA CORAM: HON’BLE MR. Present: None Mr. Mr. HARPREET SINGH BRAR 1. Instant petition has been filed under Section Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita No.391 dated 28.05.2022 Police Station proceedings arising out of the same, on the basis of compromise dated 22.05.2025 (Annexure P 2. Ms. Malvika Chauhan, Advocate respondent No.2 admits to the factum of compromise. 3. The following order was passed on IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM Date of decision: VIKESH SATIJA V/S HARYANA AND ANOTHER HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE HARPREET SINGH BRAR None for the petitioner. Mr. Satbir Gori Puriya, DAG, Haryana Mr. Anmol Sharma, Advocate for respondent **** SINGH BRAR, J. (ORAL) Instant petition has been filed under Section Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023) seeking quashing of the FIR 28.05.2022, registered under Sections Sector-58, Faridabad (Annexure P proceedings arising out of the same, on the basis of compromise dated 22.05.2025 (Annexure P-4). Ms. Malvika Chauhan, Advocate No.2 and files his power of attorney, which is taken on record. He admits to the factum of compromise. The following order was passed on “This petition has been filed under Section (528 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita quashing of FIR No.391 dated 337, 338 of IPC registered at Police Station (Annexure P-1)) along with all subsequent proceedings arising IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-30716-2025 Date of decision: 21.07.2025 ...PETITIONER ...RESPONDENTS HARPREET SINGH BRAR Haryana. , Advocate for respondents No.2 & 3. Instant petition has been filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. (528 of seeking quashing of the FIR registered under Sections 287, 337, 338 of IPC at (Annexure P-1) and all subsequent proceedings arising out of the same, on the basis of compromise dated Ms. Malvika Chauhan, Advocate accepts notice on behalf of ttorney, which is taken on record. He The following order was passed on 29.05.2025 :- petition has been filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. 528 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023) seeking dated 28.05.2022, under Sections 287, registered at Police Station Sector-58, Faridabad ) along with all subsequent proceedings arising HIMANSHU 2025.07.24 09:48 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CRM-M-30716-2025 4. In compliance of the aforesaid order, a report has been received from the concerned jurisdictional Court that the compromise between the parties is genuine and arrived at without any pressure or coercion from anyone. 5. In view of the compromise and the Hon’ble Supreme Court in and another, (2014) 6 SCC 46 Kaushalya (Mrs.) and others (1980) 1 SCC 63 Kulwinder Singh is allowed and FIR No. 2025 2 therefrom on the basis of compromise dated P-4). Notice of motion. At this stage, on the asking of the Court, Shrama, DAG, Haryana, accepts notice on No.1-State. Copy of the paper book be supplied to them during the course of day. Learned counsel for the petitioners undertakes to e the presence of respondent No.2, at the time of recording the statement. Adjourned to 21.07.2025. Service is complete. In the meantime, Parties are directed to appear before the learned trial Court/Illaqa Magistrate within a period of two weeks or any other date convenient to the trial Court/Illaqa Magistrate to get their statements recorded regarding the compromise and after recording their statements, learned trial Court/Illaqa Magistrate is directed to send report regarding the genuineness of the compromise and also to intimate whether any PO proceedings are pending against any of the party on or before the date fixed i.e. 21.07.2025. A copy of this order be sent to learned trial Court/Illaqa Magistrate through fax for compliance. In compliance of the aforesaid order, a report has been received from the concerned jurisdictional Court that the compromise between the parties is genuine and arrived at without any pressure or coercion from In view of the compromise and the Hon’ble Supreme Court in Narinder Singh and others vs. State of Punjab and another, (2014) 6 SCC 46, and Shakuntala Sawhney (Mrs) Vs. Kaushalya (Mrs.) and others (1980) 1 SCC 63 and Full Bench of this Court in Kulwinder Singh Vs. State of Punjab 2007 (3) RCR (Crl.) 1052 FIR No.391 dated 28.05.2022, registered under Sections therefrom on the basis of compromise dated 22.05.2025 (Annexure At this stage, on the asking of the Court, Ms. Geeta accepts notice on behalf of respondent Copy of the paper book be supplied to them during the Learned counsel for the petitioners undertakes to ensure the presence of respondent No.2, at the time of recording the Adjourned to 21.07.2025. In the meantime, Parties are directed to appear before the learned trial Court/Illaqa Magistrate within a period of two weeks or any other date convenient to the trial Court/Illaqa Magistrate to get their statements recorded regarding the compromise and after recording their statements, learned trial Court/Illaqa Magistrate is directed to send report regarding the genuineness of the compromise and also to intimate whether any PO proceedings are pending against any of the party on or before the date fixed A copy of this order be sent to learned trial Court/Illaqa Magistrate through fax for compliance.” In compliance of the aforesaid order, a report has been received from the concerned jurisdictional Court that the compromise between the parties is genuine and arrived at without any pressure or coercion from In view of the compromise and the ratio of law laid down by the Narinder Singh and others vs. State of Punjab Shakuntala Sawhney (Mrs) Vs. and Full Bench of this Court in Vs. State of Punjab 2007 (3) RCR (Crl.) 1052, this petition registered under Sections 287, HIMANSHU 2025.07.24 09:48 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CRM-M-30716-2025 337, 338 of IPC at all consequential petitioner. July 21, 2025 himanshu (i) (ii) 2025 3 337, 338 of IPC at Police Station Sector-58, Faridabad (Annexure P consequential proceedings arising out of the same are quashed, qua the (HARPREET SINGH BRAR Whether speaking/reasoned Whether reportable 58, Faridabad (Annexure P-1) and the same are quashed, qua the HARPREET SINGH BRAR) JUDGE Yes/No Yes/No HIMANSHU 2025.07.24 09:48 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document