SARABJIT SINGH AND OTHERS v. STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS
CRM-M/30838/2025 · 2025-07-24
H S Grewal
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 64660 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 64660 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
CRM-M No.30838 of 2025 -1-
133-2 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CRM-M No.30838 of 2025 (O&M)
Date of decision: 24.07.2025
Sarabjit Singh and Others
.....Petitioners Versus State of Punjab and Others
.....Respondent
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.S. GREWAL
Present: Mr. Ranjodh Singh Sidhu, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Gautam Thapar, Sr. DAG, Punjab. ***
H.S. GREWAL J. (Oral) CRM-27924-2025
Allowed as prayed for and the original affidavits of the complainant and the victims of FIR (Annexures P-5 to P-7) are taken on record. Main case
1. By way of this petition filed under Section 528 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS), 2023, the petitioners seek quashing of FIR No.203 dated 31.10.2019 under Sections 326, 323, 34 IPC, 1860 registered at Police Station Goindwal Sahib, District Tarn Taran (Annexure P-1) alongwith all consequential proceedings arising therefrom on the basis of compromise dated 12.05.2025 (Annexure P-3). 2. Notice of motion. Sonia Puri 2025.07.30 20:03 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
CRM-M No.30838 of 2025 -2-
3. Mr. Gautam Thapar, Sr. DAG, Punjab, accepts notice on behalf of the respondent-State. 4. Mr. Manjit Singh Sidhu, Advocate accepts notice on behalf of respondent Nos.2 to 4 by way of filing vakalatnama and confirms the factum of the compromise having been effected between the parties and states that respondents have no objection to the quashing of FIR in question. 5. Learned State counsel has stated no objection in case the FIR is quashed based upon the compromise. He further states that the petitioners are not involved in any other case. 6. I have heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the material placed on record. 8. In view of the above, even if this case is taken to its logical conclusion, it would only be an exercise in futility as the parties have already settled their differences, therefore, no purpose would be served in wasting the time and resources of the State in pursuing this case to its pre-ordained end. It would, therefore, be better to give a quietus to the issue at this stage. 9.
Accordingly, the petition is allowed and FIR No.203 dated 31.10.2019 under Sections 326, 323, 34 IPC, 1860 registered at Police Station Goindwal Sahib, District Tarn Taran (Annexure P-1) alongwith all consequential proceedings arising therefrom are quashed qua the petitioners subject to payment of costs of Rs.5,000/- each to be paid to the High Court Legal Services Committee. 10. Needless to say that the parties shall remain bound by the terms of compromise. 24th July, 2025
(H.S. GREWAL) Sonia Puri
JUDGE Whether speaking/ reasoned : Yes / No Whether reportable : Yes / No Sonia Puri 2025.07.30 20:03 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
CRM-M No.30838 of 2025 -3-
Sonia Puri 2025.07.30 20:03 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document