- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-D:15734 WP No. 101739 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA,AT DHARWAD DATED THIS THE 17TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA WRIT PETITION NO. 101739 OF 2025 (S-RES) BETWEEN: PANDURANG S/O. RAMANNA TONDUR, AGE. 32 YEARS, OCC. COOLIE, R/O. HAVANAGI, TQ. HANGAL, DIST. HAVERI. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. K. S. KORISHETTAR, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE CHIEF SECRETARY, GOVT. OF KARNATAKA, VIDHANA SOUDHA, BENGALURU-560 001. 2. THE ADDITIONAL SECRETARY, GOVT. OF KARNATAKA, DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, M.S.BUILDING, DR.AMBEDKAR VEEDHI, BENGALURU-560 001. 3. THE SECRETARY TO THE GOVT., DEPARTMENT OF PERSONAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE REFORMATION, GOVT. OF KARNATAKA, VIDHANA SOUDHA, BENGALURU-560001. 4. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, JILLA ADALITH BHAVAN, HAVERI-581110. 5. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER, SAVANUR REVENUE SUB-DIVISION, SAVANUR, TQ. SAVANUR, DIST. HAVERI-581118. …RESPONDENTS THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO ISSUE A WRIT OF MANDAMUS AND TO DIRECT THE RESPONDENT NO.1 TO 5 TO CONSIDER REPRESENTATIONS SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER AND INITIATE DISCIPLINARY ACTION AGAINST THE TAHASHILDAR, HANGAL, TQ.HANGAL, DIST. HAVERI AND ETC., Digitally signed by RAKESH S HARIHAR Location: High Court of Karnataka, Dharwad Bench, Dharwad - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-D:15734 WP No. 101739 of 2025 THIS WRIT PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: ORAL ORDER (PER: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA) 1. This Court, by order dated 15.10.2025, had passed the following direction: “Finally, 10 days’ time is granted to comply with the office objections, showing indulgence as it was a common object that is passed. In the event objections are not complied with, as directed by the Co-ordinate Bench earlier, the petitions could be dismissed without showing any indulgence to the submissions made by the counsel for the petitioners, as this would be the last straw of opportunity to comply. List this matter on 29.10.2025. Interim order subsisting, if any, is extended till the next date of hearing.” 2. Despite the directions issued by this Court, the office objections have not been complied with till date. Accordingly, the petition stands rejected for non-compliance with the office objections. Sd/- (M.NAGAPRASANNA) JUDGE VNP/CT-ASC List No.: 1 Sl No.: 208