THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE v. RAJASHEKAR S/O IRAPPA TIGADI
RFA/100156/2021 · 2025-07-09
Hanchate Sanjeevkumar
Original Suitbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 64646 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 64646 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-D:8505 RFA No. 100156 of 2021
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH DATED THIS THE 9TH DAY OF JULY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HANCHATE SANJEEVKUMAR REGULAR FIRST APPEAL NO. 100156 OF 2021 (MON) BETWEEN:
1.
THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, POLICE HEAD QUARTERS, NEAR KUMAR GHANDHARVE RANG MANDIR, BELAGAVI-590 001.
2.
THE INSPECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, NORTH ZONE, CLUB ROAD, BELAGAVI, PIN-590 001.
3.
INSPECTOR GENERAL POLICE, KARNATAKA STATE, BENGALURU-560 001.
4.
THE STATE OF KARNATAKA, REPRESENTED BY ITS CHIEF SECRETARY, SECRETARIAT OFFICE, BENGALURU-560 001.
5.
THE STATE OF KARNATAKA, REPRESENTED BY DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, BELAGAVI-590 001.
… APPELLANTS (BY SRI. KESHAVARADDI, AAG AND SRI. ASHOK T. KATTIMANI, AGA)
AND:
1.
RAJSHEKAR S/O IRAPPA TIGADI, AGE: 47 YEARS, OCC: CLASS I GOVT. ELECTRIC CONTRACTOR, R/O: PLOT NO.1255, SECTOR NO.6, SHREE NAGAR, BELAGAVI-590 016.
2.
THE PROJECT MANAGER, NIRMITI KENDRA MACCHE, BELAGAVI-590 008.
… RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. JAGADISH PATIL, ADVOCATE FOR R1)
Digitally signed by MALLIKARJUN RUDRAYYA KALMATH Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA DHARWAD BENCH
- 2 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-D:8505 RFA No. 100156 of 2021
THIS RFA IS FILED UNDER SECTION 96 READ WITH ORDER 41 RULE 1 OF CPC., PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 31.03.2021 PASSED IN O.S. NO.311/2014 ON THE FILE OF THE IV ADDITIONAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE FIRST CLASS, BELAGAVI AT BELAGAVI, BY DISMISSING THE SUIT IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE AND EQUITY.
THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, JUDGMENT IS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER:
ORAL JUDGMENT (PER: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HANCHATE SANJEEVKUMAR)
Learned Additional Government advocate filed a memo stating that before the Executing Court, the decree holder has filed a memo stating that the matter is settled out of Court and requested to close the case as not pressed. Therefore, memo is filed to dismiss the appeal as not surviving for consideration.
2. The memo is placed on record.
3. In view of the memo, the appeal is dismissed as not surviving for consideration.
Sd/- (HANCHATE SANJEEVKUMAR) JUDGE RKM CT:BCK LIST NO.: 1 SL NO.: 5