--1-- Contempt Case (Civil) No.104 of 2021 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND, RANCHI Contempt Case (Civil) No.104 of 2021 ---- 1. Manish Kumar, aged about 46 years, son of Late Niranjan Prasad, resident of B-204, Vinandani Enclave, Bargawan, PO and PS – Namkum, Ranchi 2. Raj Kumar Prasad, aged about 48 years, son of Late Janki Prasad, resident of Bhagwati Nagar, Dhipa Toli, PO – Pundag, PS – Jagarnathpur, District – Ranchi 3. Shailendra Kumar Roy, aged about 46 years, son of Narayan Roy, resident of Kamraul, PO – Haripur, PS – Ghanshyampur, District – Darbhanga, Bihar, presently residing at C/o Ramdas Singh, near DAV Kapildev School, Kadru, PO and PS – Doranda, Ranchi 4. Sunil Kumar Saran, aged about 46 years, son of Late Vinod Saran, resident of Amrawati Enclave, PO and PS – Chutia, Ranchi 5. Santosh Kumar, aged about 33 years, son of Late Ram Naresh Sharma, resident of Indrprasth Colony, Jodda Talab Road, PO and PS – Bariatu, District - Ranchi .... Petitioner -- Versus -- 1. The State of Jharkhand 2. K. Srinivasan, the Secretary, Department of Mines and Geology, Government of Jharkhand having its office at Nepal House, PO and PS – Doranda, District – Ranchi 3. Pankaj Choudhary, the Dy. Secretary, Department of Mines and Geology, Government of Jharkhand having its office at Nepal House, PO and PS – Doranda, District – Ranchi 4. Amit Kumar, the Managing Director, Jharkhand State Mineral Development Corporation having its office at Khanij Nigam Bhawan Nepal House, PO and PS – Doranda, District – Ranchi 5. Satyajit, the Establishment In-charge, Jharkhand State Mineral Development Corporation Nepal House, PO and PS – Doranda, District – Ranchi .... Opposite Parties ---- CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI --- For the Petitioner :- Mr. Ajit Kumar, Sr. Advocate --2-- Contempt Case (Civil) No.104 of 2021 For the State :- Mr. Uttam Kumar Das, Advocate For the JSMDC :- Mr. Sachin Kumar, Advocate :- Mr. Ravi Prakash Mishra, Advocate ---- 18/10.01.2025 Based on the undertaking in the counter affidavit filed in the writ court by the respondent Nos.3 and 4 the writ petition was disposed of. 2. This contempt petition was taken on several dates and time to time different orders have been passed, subsequently the last show cause has been filed in which the order dated 23.08.2022 is annexed wherein it is disclosed that the petitioners have been promoted on the post of Head Clerk in the pay scale of 9300-34,800, Grade Pay 4200/- revised pay matrix Level 6. 3. The controversy on the basis of paragraph No.5 is there with regard to the promotion on the post of Accountant/Assistant. It was contended by the contemners that the Head Clerk is the next promotional post of the petitioners, these aspects of the matters are required to be looked into which can be agitated by the petitioners in a fresh proceeding, the parameters of contempt proceedings are well known. 4. In view of the above, this contempt proceeding is dropped and disposed of with liberty to the petitioners to file a fresh petition, if so advised, or may take recourse under the law. (Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi, J.) Sangam/