BHANUMATI MAHATO AND ORS v. THE ORIENTAL INS. CO. LTD. AND ANR
COT/101/2024 · 2025-05-07
Ananya Bandyopadhyay
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 64618 (CAL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 64618 (CAL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
23.02.2026 1 to 2 Srimanta, A.R. (Ct.)
FMAT(MV) 534 of 2023
Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd.
Vs.
Bhanumati Mahato & Ors.
With
COT 101 of 2024 Bhanumati Mahato & Ors.
Vs. Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd. & Anr.
Mr. Sanjay Paul
… for the appellant/insurance co.
Mr. Krishanu Banik … for the respondents/claimants
Inadvertent typographical error crept in
judgment dated 7th May, 2025. In the table of 4th row and 4th column of page No. 3 of the judgment dated 7th May, 2025 “it was erroneously recorded as ‘Less: 1/3rd Personal Expenses Rs. 1,78,000/-’ instead of ‘Total Rs. 1,68,000/-’ . In the table of 5th row and 5th column of page No. 3 of the judgment dated 7th May, 2025 “it was erroneously recorded as ‘1/4th Deduction (Rs. 1,78,000/- Rs. 44,500) Rs. 1,33,500/-’ instead of ‘1/4th Deduction (Rs. 1,68,000 – 42,000) Rs. 1,26,000/-’ . In the table of 6th row and 6th column of page No. 3 of the judgment dated 7th May, 2025 “it
2 was erroneously recorded as ‘Multiplier 15 (Rs. 1,33,500 x 15)- Rs. 20,02,500/-’ instead of ‘Multiplier 15(Rs. 1,26,000/- x 15) Rs. 18,90,000/-’ . In the table of 8th row and 8th column of page No. 3 of the judgment dated 7th May, 2025 “it was erroneously recorded as ‘Amount of compensation Rs. 20,86,500/-’ instead of ‘Amount of compensation Rs. 19,74,000/-’ . In the 2nd line of 9th paragraph and 2nd line of 10th Paragraph of the judgment dated 7th May, 2025
“it was erroneously recorded as ‘Rs. 20,86,500/-’ instead of ’19,74,000/-’ . In paragraph 10 of the impugned judgment and order is modified to the extent that further six weeks time from the date of communication of this
order to be given to the learned advocate representing the appellant/insurance company to deposit the amount i.e. 19,74,000/- before the office of the Learned Registrar General, High Court at Calcutta and liberty is granted to the appellant/insurance company to withdraw the statutory amount of Rs. 25,000/- together with accrued interest from the office of the learned Registrar General, High Court at Calcutta after deposit the above compensation amount. Other portions of the judgment remain unaltered.
3 Department is directed to make necessary correction to that effect in the judgment dated
07.05.2025.
(Ananya Bandyopadhyay, J.)