SUMIT KUMAR AND OTHERS v. STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS
CWP/17884/2022 · 2025-05-22
Kuldeep Tiwari
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 64604 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 64604 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
(218)
Sumit Kumar and others State of Haryana
CORAM:
Present:
KULDEEP TIWARI
1.
Court that the prayer made through the instant writ petition, has become infructuous, and therefore, he
2.
been rendered infructuous.
May 22, 2025 Manpreet
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
AT CHANDIGARH
Sumit Kumar and others
Versus Haryana and others
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE KULDEEP TIWARI Mr. C.S. Singhal, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Rajesh Gaur, Addl. AG, Haryana for respondents No.1 to 3. **** KULDEEP TIWARI, J.(ORAL) At the very outset, learned counsel for the petitioner, Court that the prayer made through the instant writ petition, has become infructuous, and therefore, he seeks permission to withdraw Consequently, the instant writ petition is been rendered infructuous.
, 2025 Whether speaking/reasoned Whether reportable
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CWP-17884-2022 Date of Decision : 22.05.2025
…Petitioners Versus
...Respondents KULDEEP TIWARI Rajesh Gaur, Addl. AG, Haryana
learned counsel for the petitioner, informs this Court that the prayer made through the instant writ petition, has become seeks permission to withdraw the same. Consequently, the instant writ petition is dismissed as having
(KULDEEP TIWARI)
JUDGE : Yes/No : Yes/No
informs this Court that the prayer made through the instant writ petition, has become having
MANPREET SINGH 2025.05.26 17:56 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this
order/judgment