SUSHIL PANDEY v. SRI MANOJ KUMAR-II, ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGE (FTC)
CAPL/2652/2025 · 2025-07-09
Neeraj Tiwari
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 64603 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 64603 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:109759 Court No. - 1 Case :- CONTEMPT APPLICATION (CIVIL) No. - 2652 of 2025 Applicant :- Sushil Pandey Opposite Party :- Sri Manoj Kumar-Ii, Additional District Judge (Ftc) Counsel for Applicant :- Nipun Singh,Parijat Srivastava Hon'ble Neeraj Tiwari,J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant and Sri Sudhir Mehrotra, learned counsel for the opposite party.
2. Pursuant to order of this Court dated 03.07.2025, learned counsel for the opposite party produced instruction dated 05.07.2025, which is taken on record.
3. As per the instruction, he submitted that order of writ Court was passed on 22.04.2022, whereas, the case is being listed since 11.11.2021 for framing of charges, but till date, charges has not been framed.
4. Under such facts of the case, there is no wilful disobedience of the order of writ Court.
5. Application is disposed of with direction to District and Sessions Judge, Varanasi to mention the order of High Court while fixing the future dates to avoid any kind of confusion.
6. Applicant is directed to serve a copy of order of this Court to District and Sessions Judge, Varanasi.
7. This order shall abide by the further order passed by this Court in Application U/s 482 No. 3723 of 2022. Order Date :- 10.7.2025 ADY Digitally signed by :- AMAR DEEP YADAV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad