[2025:RJ-JP:25738] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Restoration Application No. 406/2018 IN S.B. Civil Misc. Appeal No. 3966/2014 Nanglamal Sugar Limited, Mundali, Distt. Meerut U.p. Presently Known As Mawana Sugars Limited, Since The Amalgamation Of The Nanglamal Sugar Limited With Mawana Sugars Limited By Order Of The Honble Delhi High Court Through Shri Pankaj Upadhyaya, General Manager Legal And Special Power Of Attorney Holder ----Petitioner Versus 1. Sita Ram S/o Bardi Chand, R/o Village Ramsinghpura, Tehsil Dausa, Distt. Dausa. 2. Champa Devi W/o Sita Ram, R/o Village Ramsinghpura, Tehsil Dausa, Distt. Dausa. 3. Mantu D/o Sita Ram, R/o Village Ramsinghpura, Tehsil Dausa, Distt. Dausa. 4. Manju D/o Sita Ram, R/o Village Ramsinghpura, Tehsil Dausa, Distt. Dausa. 5. Rajanti Devi Widow Of Late Mukesh, R/o Village Ramsinghpura, Tehsil Dausa, Distt. Dausa. 6. Mamta D/o Late Mukesh, Minor Through Natural Guardian And Mother Smt. Rajanti Devi Widow Of Late Mukesh, R/o Village Ramsinghpura, Tehsil Dausa, Distt. Dausa. 7. Kesanta D/o Late Mukesh, Minor Through Natural Guardian And Mother Smt. Rajanti Devi Widow Of Late, R/o Village Ramsinghpura, Tehsil Dausa, Distt. Dausa. Claimant-Respondents PERFORMA RESPONDENTS 8. General Manager, Shri Krishan Murti, Nanglamal Sugar Limited, Mundali, Distt. Meerut U.p. Presently Known As Mawana Sugars Limited, Since The Amalgamation Of The Nanglamal Sugar Limited With Mawana Sugars Limited By Order Of The Honble Delhi High Court 9. General Manager, Shri Bhargava, Nanglamal Sugar Limited, Mundali, Distt. Meerut U.p. Presently Known As [2025:RJ-JP:25738] (2 of 2) [CRES-406/2018] Mawana Sugars Limited, Since The Amalgamation Of The Nanglamal Sugar Limited With Mawana Sugars Limited By Order Of The Honble Delhi High Court 10. Commissioner, Workman Compensation, Dausa. ----Opposite Party-ProformaRespondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Mahesh Chand Gautam for Mr. Mahesh Sharma For Respondent(s) : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANEESH SHARMA Order 11/07/2025 It has been contended by learned counsel for the petitioner that the main contesting respondents No.1 to 7 have been served in the restoration application and remaining respondents are proforma respondents. At the request of counsel for petitioner, service of notices upon remaining respondents, is dispensed with. Heard on restoration application. For the reasons mentioned in the application, same is allowed. S.B. Civil Misc. Appeal No. 3966/2014 is ordered to be restored to its original number. (MANEESH SHARMA),J SOURAV /49