Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 64587 (PNJ)

MANDEEP SINGH v. STATE OF PUNJAB

CRM-M/30132/2025 · 2025-08-20

Sanjay Vashisth

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

CRM-M-30132-2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 230 CRM-M-30132-2025 Decided on:20.08.2025 Mandeep Singh ......Petitioner Versus State of Punjab ......Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY VASHISTH Present: Mr. K.S. Brar, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Manjinder Singh Bhullar, DAG, Punjab. **** SANJAY VASHISTH , J. 1. Present petition has been filed under Section 483 of BNSS, 2023 seeking regular bail in case FIR No. 18 dated 07.02.2024, under Sections 302 and 201 IPC, registered at Police Station Sadar Budhlada, District Mansa. 2. Learned State counsel has filed status report by way of an affidavit of Sikander Singh, PPS, Deputy Superintendent of Police, Sub Division Budhlada, District Mansa, in Court today. Same is taken on record. Registry is directed to tag the same at appropriate place with the paper-book. Learned State counsel draws the attention of the Court to paragraphs 8 and 11 of the said status report, which read as under: “8. That during interrogation the petitioner made a disclosure statement that on dated 07.02.2024 after killing the deceased Veerpal Kaur in order to destroy the dead body, petitioner has thrown it in the fields RASHMI 2025.08.20 18:39 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CRM-M-30132-2025 of mustard seeds and further in the effect of disclosure statement and at the demarcation of the petitioner the keypad mobile phone of dark blue colour of JIO Bharat along with SIM No. 99156-43997 of JIO Company of the deceased Veerpal Kaur was recovered, which was taken into police possession vide separate recovery  memo. Then further in the effect of the disclosure statement of the petitioner the motor cycle no. PB-31R-3569 of red colour of Platina Company, that was used during the incident and one touch screen mobile phone of Realme along with No. 98158-17102 of Airtel company of the petitioner were made recovered at the demarcation of the petitioner. Then from under the seat of the motorcycle RC was recovered on it Chassi No. MD2A76AZ3GRG50038 and Engine No. PFZRGG24577 was mentioned and further it was issued on dated 15.11.2016 by Registration Authority Mansa to the petitioner. Then all these above mentioned three things were taken into the police possession vide separate recovery memo. 9. xxx 10. xxx 11. That on dated 15.02.2024 when SHO was presented at the police station then the owner of the restaurant Royal i.e. Sandeep Singh son of Balbir Singh r/o Guladi Tehsil Moonak, District Sangrur came to the PS Sadar Budhlada along with one Pendrive of 32 G.B. of Sandisk Company and it was alleged that this Pendrive contains the video clip relating to the deceased Veerpal Kaur wife of Balwinder Singh and the petitioner when they were entering the village Ralli, when they were sitting in the waiting hall of the restaurant, when they were standing at the reception of the restaurant, when they were going out of the restaurant and further after getting out of the restaurant video clip of RASHMI 2025.08.20 18:39 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CRM-M-30132-2025 deceased Veerpal Kaur and the petitioner going towards the place of crime spot on the motorcycle and after some time video clip of the petitioner was also got captured when petitioner was returning alone on his bike from the place of crime spot on the main road of Budhlada towards Bareta. Then this pendrive was taken into police possession vide separate memo of presentation.” 3. Faced with the above situation, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the present petition. 4. Dismissed as withdrawn, as prayed for. (SANJAY VASHISTH) JUDGE August 20, 2025 rashmi Whether Speaking/Reasoned: YES/NO Whether Reportable: YES/NO RASHMI 2025.08.20 18:39 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document