Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 6458 (MAD)

J.RAJESHWARI v. THE COMMISSIONER OF POLICE

WP/18447/2025 · 2026-06-03

G K Ilanthiraiyan

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

WP No. 18447 of 2025 __________ Page1 of 4 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 03-06-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE G.K. ILANTHIRAIYAN WP No. 18447 of 2025 J.Rajeshwari D/o Jayaraman, No 356, N.H. Road Town Hall, Opp Hmr Hotel, Coimbatore 641 001 ..Petitioner(s) Vs 1. The Commissioner Of Police Coimbatore City Huzur Road Uppilipalayam Coimbatore 641 018 2. The State Rep. By The Inspector Of Police, B4, Ukkadam Police Station, N.H. Rod Ukkadam, Coimbatore 641 001 3. T.S. Vijay Kalyan S.O Shanmuganathan, No 6, Hosur Road, Coimbatore 641 018 4. Arumugham S/o Ponnusamy No 68-a Ponnusamy Road, R.S. Puram Coimbatore 641 002 ..Respondent(s) PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution seeking issuance of Writ of Mandamus directing the 2nd Respondent to consider the petitioners representation dated 09.05.2025 to not interfere in the petitioners civil dispute and consequently not to harass the petitioner based on the 4th Respondents complaint. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 18447 of 2025 __________ Page2 of 4 For Petitioner(s): Mr.C.Elamurugan For Respondent(s): Mr.R.Ganesh Kumar Government Counsel for R1 & R2 M/s,.Shobana Ramasubramaniyan for R4 ORDER This Writ Petition has been filed seeking for a direction to the 2nd respondent to consider the petitioner’s representation dated 09.05.2025 to not to interfere in the petitioner’s civil dispute and consequently not to harass the petitioner based on the 4th respondents complaint. 2. It is seen that the premises owned by the fourth respondent were leased out to the petitioner. The petitioner indulged in illegal activities by selling banned tobacco products on the said premises. Consequently, the second respondent registered FIRs against the petitioner in Crime No. 97 of 2022 and Crime No. 42 of 2023. Apart from these cases, the petitioner was also involved in another case in S.T.C. No. 547 of 2025, wherein she pleaded guilty and paid the fine. This being the case, the petitioner submitted a representation seeking a direction to the police not to harass her. Since the petitioner is a habitual accused, she is not entitled to the relief sought in this petition. Furthermore, the subject property is currently facing statutory action by the Public Health Department. Therefore, the Writ Petition is devoid of merits and is liable to be dismissed. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 18447 of 2025 __________ Page3 of 4 3. Accordingly, this Writ Petition is dismissed. No costs. 03-06-2026 SMA To 1. The Commissioner Of Police, Coimbatore City Huzur Road, Uppilipalayam Coimbatore 641 018 2. The Inspector Of Police, B4, Ukkadam Police Station, N.H. Rod Ukkadam, Coimbatore 641 001 3. The Public Prosecutor, Madras High Court. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 18447 of 2025 __________ Page4 of 4 G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN, J. SMA WP No. 18447 of 2025 03-06-2026 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 18447 of 2025 __________ Page5 of 4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis