Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 64555 (PNJ)

BHUPINDER SINGH v. STATE OF PUNJAB

CRM-M/30174/2025 · 2025-07-07

N S Shekhawat

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 304 CRM-M-30174-2025 Date of Decision: 07.07.2025 BHUPINDER SINGH ...PETITIONER Versus STATE OF PUNJAB ... RESPONDENT CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE N. S. SHEKHAWAT Present: Mr. M. S. Uppal, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Ravneet Singh Joshi, Deputy, A.G., Punjab. Mr. Amandeep Singh Sandhu, Advocate for the complainant. ***** N. S. SHEKHAWAT , J. (Oral) 1. The petitioner has filed the present petition under Section 482 of B.N.S.S with a prayer to grant anticipatory bail to him in case FIR No.61, dated 07.03.2023, under Section 420/465/471/120-B of IPC, registered at Police Station City 2 Mansa, District Mansa (Annexure P-1). 2. While granting the concession of interim anticipatory bail by this Court on 28.05.2025, the following contentions were noticed by this Court and the same have been reproduced below:- “Learned counsel for the petitioner contends that in the present case, the allegations were primarily levelled against Jagmohan Singh, Secretary, Mansa District Cricket VIPIN KUMAR 2025.07.08 18:39 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this judgment/order CRM-M-30174-2025 2 Association, who has been granted the concession of interim anticipatory bail by the Court of Additional Sessions Judge, Mansa vide order (Annexure P-6). He further contends that coaccused namely Saksham Kumar and Jasprit Singh have also been granted the concession of interim anticipatory bail by this Court vide Annexures P-7 and P-8, respectively. ” 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner has reiterated the submissions and further submits that the petitioner has joined the investigation and his custodial interrogation may not be required. 4. Learned State counsel also submits that the petitioner has joined the investigation and is no longer required for further investigation. 5. In view of the above statement made by learned counsel for the parties, the interim order dated 28.05.2025 is made absolute. The petitioner shall continue to join the investigation, as and when called by the Investigating Officer. The petitioner shall also abide by the conditions as specified under Section 482 (2) of B.N.S.S. 07.07.2025. (N. S. SHEKHAWAT) vipin JUDGE Whether reasoned/speaking : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No VIPIN KUMAR 2025.07.08 18:39 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this judgment/order