NARINDER SINGH v. SHANTANU SHARMA, IAS AND ANOTHER
COCP/2233/2024 · 2025-09-01
Nidhi Gupta
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 64552 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 64552 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA 212
Narinder Singh
Shantanu Sharma and
CORAM:
Present:-
NIDHI GUPTA J. (Oral)
proceedings 14.2.2024 Court in CWP Haryana and others” vide which the petition although was disposed of on merits being not pressed, however, regarding the second prayer made therein, the Assistant Collector 2 expedite the partition proceedings pending since 2008 and coclude the same (subject to any stay order etc. passed by any higher au expeditiously, within three months from the date of receipt of certified copy of the order.
COCP-2233-2024 (O & M) IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
COCP No.2233 of 2024
Date of decision : Narinder Singh Versus Shantanu Sharma and another
CORAM:- HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDHI GUPTA
Mr. Fateh Saini, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. Priyavrat Parashar, AAG, Haryana NIDHI GUPTA J. (Oral)
Prayer in this petition is for initiation of contempt proceedings against the respondents for not complying the order dated 14.2.2024 (Annexure P-1) passed by a co Court in CWP-3319-2024 titled as “Narinder Singh vs. State of Haryana and others” vide which the petition although was disposed of erits being not pressed, however, regarding the second prayer made therein, the Assistant Collector 2 expedite the partition proceedings pending since 2008 and coclude the same (subject to any stay order etc. passed by any higher au expeditiously, within three months from the date of receipt of certified copy of the order.
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 2233 of 2024 (O & M) Date of decision :-01.09.2025 …..Petitioner …..Respondents HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDHI GUPTA Mr. Priyavrat Parashar, AAG, Haryana. Prayer in this petition is for initiation of contempt for not complying the order dated 1) passed by a co-ordinate Bench of this Narinder Singh vs. State of Haryana and others” vide which the petition although was disposed of erits being not pressed, however, regarding the second prayer made therein, the Assistant Collector 2nd Grade was directed to expedite the partition proceedings pending since 2008 and coclude the same (subject to any stay order etc. passed by any higher authorities) expeditiously, within three months from the date of receipt of certified VIJAY ASIJA 2025.09.02 18.59 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
submits that the present petition has been rendered infructuous and the same may be disposed of
September 01 Vijay Asija
Whether speaking/reasoned Yes / No Whether Reportable Yes / No
COCP-2233-2024 (O & M)
At the very outset, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the present petition has been rendered infructuous and the same may be disposed of as such.
Ordered accordingly.
Rule stands discharged.
Pending application(s), if any, shall stands disposed of. September 01, 2025
Whether speaking/reasoned Yes / No Whether Reportable Yes / No
2 At the very outset, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the present petition has been rendered infructuous and the Pending application(s), if any, shall stands disposed of.
( NIDHI GUPTA )
JUDGE VIJAY ASIJA 2025.09.02 18.59 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document