KONDAGAON COLLEGE OF NURSING v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH
WPC/823/2021 · 2025-02-28
Shri Rakesh Mohan Pandey
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 6455 (CHH) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 6455 (CHH) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1
2025:CGHC:10166
NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 823 of 2021 • Kondagaon College Of Nursing Umarkot Road, Near Govt. Primary School, Kondagaon, Bastar Chattisgarh Run By Ekta Srijan Seva Samiti Registered Under The Society Registration Act 1973 Through The Secretary Ekta Srijan Seva Samiti Santoshi Nagar, Ring Road, Raipur, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh
... Petitioner Versus
1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary To The Govt. Of Chhattisgarh Department Of Medical Education Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar, PS Rakhi, Raipur, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh
2. The Director, Directorate Of Medical Education, Old Nursing Hostel, Mantralaya Campus, Raipur District Raipur Chhattisgarh. 492001
3. Indian Nursing Council Through Registrar Indian Nursing Council 8th Floor, NBCC Centre, Plot No. 2 Community Centre, Okhla Phase-I New Delhi- 110020
4. Chhattisgarh Nurses Registration Council Through The Registrar, Chhattisgarh Nurses Registration Council Old Nurses Hostel Directorate Health Services Raipur, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh
... Respondents For Petitioner : Mr. Anurag Dayal Shrivastava, Advocate For Respondents No. 1 & 2 For Respondent No. 3 For Respondent No. 4 : : : Mr. Vinay Pandey, Deputy Advocate General Ms. Jyoti Singh, Advocate holding the brief of Mr. Ramakant Mishra, Deputy Solicitor General Mr. Vikas Dubey, Advocate Digitally signed by RAMESH KUMAR VATTI
2 Hon’ble Shri Justice Rakesh Mohan Pandey
Order on Board 28/02/2025
1. At the very outset, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would submit that grievance of the petitioner has already been redressed as
order impugned has been withdrawn by the respondent authorities and the petitioner was permitted to take admission by virtue of interim
order; thus, he would pray to withdraw this writ petition with liberty to revive it if cause of action subsists.
2. On the other hand, learned counsel appearing for the respondents would not oppose the submission made by counsel for the petitioner.
3. Recording the submission made by counsel for the petitioner, the instant petition is dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty. Sd/-
(Rakesh Mohan Pandey)
Judge vatti