Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 64548 (PNJ)

RAVINDER SINGH AND ANOTHER v. RAVINDER KUMAR AND OTHERS

CR/3519/2022 · 2025-03-19

Anil Kshetarpal

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

CR-3519-2022 (O&M) -1- 272 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CR-3519-2022 (O&M) Date of decision : 19.03.2025 Ravinder Singh and another ...Petitioners Vs. Ravinder Kumar and others ...Respondent CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KSHETARPAL Present: Mr. Nitish Garg, Advocate for the petitioners. *** ANIL KSHETARPAL , J. (Oral) 1. The plaintiffs herein filed a suit for grant of decree of permanent injunction restraining the defendant from alienating his share measuring 02 biswas. 2. The suit was filed in the year 2018. They filed an application for permission to amend the plaint so as to incorporate the relief of declaration. State Bank of India filed application under Order 7 Rule 11 of the Code of Civil procedure, 1908 to reject the plaintiff on the ground that Civil Court's jurisdiction is barred under Section 34 of the Securitization and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002, which has been allowed. The petitioner has filed an appeal before the First Appellate Court which is pending. As of now, the plaint filed by the plaintiff stands rejected. 3. Learned counsel representing the petitioners submits that the NEERAJ 2025.03.21 10:47 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CR-3519-2022 (O&M) -2- revision petition be disposed of with liberty to file an application for revival, if his appeal is allowed and the suit is revived. 4. Ordered accordingly. 5. All the pending miscellaneous applications, if any, are also disposed of. (ANIL KSHETARPAL) 19.03.2025 JUDGE neeraj Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes No Whether Reportable : Yes No NEERAJ 2025.03.21 10:47 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document