Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 64536 (BOM)

AMOL S/O DILIP WANKHADE v. THE SUB DIVISIONAL OFFICER, WANI, YAVATMAL AND ANOTHER

WP/7513/2025 · 2025-12-02

Shri Anil S Kilor, Shri Rajnish R Vyas

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 106.wp.7513.2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR WRIT PETITION NO.7513 OF 2025 Amol s/o Dilip Wankhade ..vs.. Sub Divisional Officer Wani and anr. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Shri A.R. Ingole, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri P.P. Pendke, Assistant Government Pleader for respondent nos. 1 and 2/State. CORAM: ANIL S. KILOR AND RAJNISH R. VYAS, JJ. DATED : 02/12/2025. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner. 2. In short, it is his contention that his vehicle has been illegally seized by the respondent Authority. He further submits that the similar issue was decided by this Court in Writ Petition No.917 of 2023. 3. Be that as it may, the aforesaid fact can always be brought into the notice of the respondent no.1 Authority. In that view of the matter, we permit the petitioner to raise the aforesaid issue before respondent no.1. 4. Respondent no. 1 Sub Divisional Officer, Wani, is directed to decide the said issue regarding illegal seizure of vehicle, within three weeks from today. 5. The writ petition stands disposed of accordingly. (RAJNISH R. VYAS , J. ) (ANIL S. KILOR , J. ) Trupti