IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA 152 SANDHIYA AND ANOTHER STATE OF PUNJAB CORAM: HON’BLE MRS. Present : Mr Ms. Himani Arora, A.A.G, Punjab MANISHA BATRA 1. The present petition has been filed under Article 226 Constitution of India seeking issuance of a writ of official respondents at the hands of respondent dated 23.05.2025 (Annexure P 2. At the very outset, learned co submitted that the petitioner 23.05.2025 before the (Annexure P-5) but the same has not yet been considered and no action has He further submitted that at this stage, the appropriate directions are issued to Police, Barnala, Punjab petitioners and take 3. Notice of motion. IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRWP No. Date of decision: SANDHIYA AND ANOTHER Versus STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE MANISHA BATRA Mr. Chirag Suri, Advocate for the Ms. Himani Arora, A.A.G, Punjab **** MANISHA BATRA, J. (oral) The present petition has been filed under Article 226 Constitution of India seeking issuance of a writ of official respondents No.2 and 3 to protect the life and liberty of the petitioner at the hands of respondents No. 4 to 8 and to take action on dated 23.05.2025 (Annexure P-5). At the very outset, learned co submitted that the petitioners have recently filed a representation on before the Senior Superintendent ) raising their grievances as mentioned same has not yet been considered and no action has further submitted that at this stage, the petitioner appropriate directions are issued to respondent No. Barnala, Punjab to decide the aforesaid representation filed by the and take necessary action thereon. Notice of motion. IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH No.5584 of 2025 Date of decision: 26.05.2025 …. Petitioners …. Respondents MANISHA BATRA , Advocate for the petitioners. Ms. Himani Arora, A.A.G, Punjab. The present petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking issuance of a writ of mandamus directing the to protect the life and liberty of the petitioners take action on their representation At the very outset, learned counsel for the petitioners has recently filed a representation on Superintendent of Police, Barnala, Punjab mentioned in the present petition same has not yet been considered and no action has been taken thereon. petitioners would be satisfied if respondent No. 2- Senior Superintendent of decide the aforesaid representation filed by the of the the s their representation has recently filed a representation on Barnala, Punjab petition been taken thereon. satisfied if of decide the aforesaid representation filed by the Jyoti 2025.05.27 17:34 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document 4. Ms. Himani Arora, A.A.G, Punjab accepted the notice on behalf of the respondent needful will be done in due course. Let a complete set of the supplied to her 5. In view of the limited prayer made by the petitioner commenting anything on the merits of the case, the present of at this stage with a direction to respondent No. 2 to decide representation period of 15 days law. Needless to say, if any threat is found to the respondents would provide and liberty. 26.05.2025 Jyoti-IV CRWP No.5584 of 2025 Ms. Himani Arora, A.A.G, Punjab accepted the notice on behalf of the respondent needful will be done in due course. Let a complete set of the er during the course of the day. In view of the limited prayer made by the petitioner commenting anything on the merits of the case, the present of at this stage with a direction to respondent No. 2 to decide dated 23.05.2025 (Annexure P 15 days from today, by passing a speaking order in law. Needless to say, if any threat is found to the respondents would provide them adequate security in order to protect their life (MANISHA BATRA) Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/No. Whether reportable : Yes/No CRWP No.5584 of 2025 -2- Ms. Himani Arora, A.A.G, Punjab, who is present in Court, has accepted the notice on behalf of the respondents-State and submits that the needful will be done in due course. Let a complete set of the paperbook be In view of the limited prayer made by the petitioners, without commenting anything on the merits of the case, the present petition is disposed of at this stage with a direction to respondent No. 2 to decide the aforesaid Annexure P-5) of the petitioners within a from today, by passing a speaking order in accordance with law. Needless to say, if any threat is found to the petitioners, the official them adequate security in order to protect their life (MANISHA BATRA) JUDGE Yes/No. Yes/No who is present in Court, has the paperbook be , without disposed the aforesaid within a accordance with , the official them adequate security in order to protect their life Jyoti 2025.05.27 17:34 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document