Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jammu and Kashmir · body

2025 DAILYLAW 6449 (JK)

M/S FINAL STOP TH.ITS PROPRIETOR v. UNION TERRITORY OF J AND K (HIGHER EDUCATION) AND ORS

WP(C)/400/2025 · 2025-02-27

Rahul Bharti

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

S.No.51 Supp. List IN THE HIGH COURT 0F JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT SRINAGAR WP (C ) 400/2025 M/S FINAL STOP TH. ITS PROPRIETOR …Petitioner(s)/Appellant(s) Through: Mr. Owais Shafi, Advocate Vs. UT OF J AND K AND ORS. ...Respondent(s) Through: CORAM:HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAHUL BHARTI, JUDGE ORDER 27-02-2025 1. On account of lack of necessary parties to the writ petition and these being the co-bidders to e-tender Notice No. 28 of 2024 dated 15-01-2025 issued in the name and on behalf of the Government Medical College, Srinagar, by the Member Secretary Rate Contract Committee for the purpose of provisions of hospital diet facility for In-patients at the Government Medical College and its associated hospitals, Srinagar as per the averments made in the writ petition, it is being sought to be pleaded that the exercise under the e-tender Notice is being compromised by entertaining the defaulting bidders. 2. In this regard, reference is made to tender sheet reflecting the names of the participating bidders in addition to the petitioner, who came to submit their respective bids and they are seven in number with the petitioner as being eighth bidder. 3. This petition is for seeking a direction unto the respondents to strictly adhere to the terms and conditions in e-NIT in reference. 4. The tender committee seized of the exercise has yet to take a final call and the petitioner rushing to this court with the present writ petition is pointer towards the fact that the petitioner is seeking to dictate its own interest to the tender committee as to in what manner the course of action in settling the contract allotment should be taken by the contract committee. 5. The very fact that the petitioner has not named co- bidders as respondents in the writ petition is a pointer towards the fact that the petitioner is not having any grievance that any of the co-bidder is being favoured and that being so then where lies the grievance of the petitioner to come to this Court is best known to the petitioner except that the institution of the writ petition is nothing but a sponsored one whereby the tender exercise is meant to be stalled or frustrated on one pretext or other by reference to indulgence of this Court in the matter with or without any interim direction. 6. Writ petition, is thus, dismissed as misconceived and frivolous. (RAHUL BHARTI) JUDGE SRINAGAR: 27-02-2025 Mubashir