Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010015962025 2025:GAU-AS:13779 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/460/2025 M/S MAA ENTERPRISE A PROPRIETORSHIP FIRM AND IS REP. BY ITS PROPRITOR SMT ASHARANI DOLEY, HOUSE NO. 74 KALAPAHAR MAIN ROAD, GUWAHATI, KAMRUP METRO, ASSAM, PIN-781018. VERSUS THE MISSING AUTONOMOUS COUNCIL AND 3 ORS. TO BE REP. BY THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE MEMBER, GOGAMUKH, DHEMAJI, ASSAM 2:THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY MISSING AUTONOMOUS COUNCIL GOGAMUKH DHEMAJI ASSAM 3:THE STATE OF ASSAM REP. BY THE COMMISSIONER- SECRETARY TO THE GOVT OF ASSAM WPT AND BC DEPARTMENT DISPUR GUWAHATI-6. 4:ORIENT PROCESSORS PVT. LTD. UNIT-II (TEXTILE DIVISION) (THROUGH ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR/ AUTHORIZED PERSON) ORIENT BUILDING SHIV SHAKTI PATH LALUNG GAON GUWAHATI-781040 KAMRUP METRO ASSA Page No.# 2/3 Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. B CHAKRAVARTY, MR. R K PRADHAN,MR. A K SAIKIA,A SARMA Advocate for the Respondent : SC, MISING AUTONOMOUS COUNCIL, R SAHIINII(R-4),MS P DEVI(R-4),MR. D NATH (R-4),SC, WPT AND BC BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH MAZUMDAR ORDER Date : 15.10.2025 Heard Ms. A. Sarma, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. D. Gogoi, learned counsel appearing for the respondent No. 1 and 2; Mr. R. Dhar, learned counsel appearing for the respondent No. 3 and Mr. D. Nath, learned senior government advocate appearing for the respondent No. 4. 2. This writ petition was instituted praying for setting aside of the work contract for supply of “Cotton Yarn” as per the tender issued on 01.07.2024, where the petitioner had asserted that there was irregularities in the decision of the respondents to award the contract to the respondent No. 4. 3. Today, when the matter is taken up, it has been submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner as well as the learned counsel for the respondents that the supply of the item as required by the work order has already been completed and the payment has also been made to the respondent No. 4, and in such circumstances nothing remains to be adjudicated in the present petition. 4. By submission of both the parties, this writ petition is closed, as there remains nothing to adjudicate. Page No.# 3/3 5. Accordingly, this writ petition stands disposed of. JUDGE Comparing Assistant