Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 64478 (PNJ)

UT OF CHANDIGARH AND ANOTHER v. AMBIKA AND OTHERS

CWP/21668/2016 · 2025-08-19

Harsimran Singh Sethi, Vikas Suri

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

CWP-21668-2016 (O&M) -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 101 CWP-21668-2016 (O&M) Date of Decision :19.08.2025 Union Territory of Chandigarh and another ...Petitioner Versus Ambika and others ..Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKAS SURI Present: Mr. Amit Jhanji, Senior Standing Counsel with Mr. Parminder Singh, Standing Counsel for petitioner-U.T. Chandigarh None for the respondents. * * * Harsimran Singh Sethi, J. (Oral) 1. Learned Senior counsel for the petitioner-U.T., Chd. submits that keeping in view the directions given, the claim of respondent No.1 was considered and appropriate order was passed by the authorities concerned on 19.12.2015 wherein, it has been mentioned that as respondent No.1 failed to qualify the written test, she was ousted from the zone of consideration hence, the present petition which was filed to adjudicate the eligibility of the respondent No.1 has been rendered infructuous in view of the subsequent events which have come into being and the present petition may kindly be disposed of having been rendered infructuous especially when, respondent No.1 has not challenged the order dated 19.12.2015 passed by the authorities AARTI SHARMA 2025.08.21 10:52 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CWP-21668-2016 (O&M) -2- concerned as respondent No.1 failed to qualify for the post in question. 2. Ordered accordingly. 3. Civil miscellaneous application pending, if any, is also disposed of. (HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI) JUDGE August 19, 2025 (VIKAS SURI) aarti JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes Whether reportable : No AARTI SHARMA 2025.08.21 10:52 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document