IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.1810 of 2022 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.24117 of 2018 ====================================================== Raj Mangal Rai son of Sri Ramji Rai, resident of Village- Bodarhi, Police Station- Dawath, District- Rohtas. ... ... Petitioner/s Versus 1. The State of Bihar through the District Magistrate, Rohtas namely Sri Dharmendra Kumar. 2. Sri Dharmendra Kumar, the District Magistrate, Rohtas. 3. Sri Ashish Bharti, The Superintendent of Police, Rohtas. 4. Sri Vijayant, The Sub- Divisional Officer, Bikramganj, Rohtas. 5. Sri Shashi Bhushan Singh, The Dy. S.P., Bikramganj, Rohtas. 6. Sri Nawal Kant, The Circle Officer, Dawath, Rohtas. 7. Sri Atyendra Kumar, The Officer-in- Charge, Dawath, Rohtas. 8. Upendra Rai son of Late Shrikant Rai, resident of Village Bodarhi, P.S.- Dawath, District- Rohtas. 9. Sushil Rai son of Late Awadh Bihari Rai, resident of Village Bodarhi, P.S.- Dawath, District- Rohtas. 10. Indu Bhushan Rai son of Shri Sheo Kumar Rai resident of Village Bodarhi, P.S.- Dawath, District- Rohtas. 11. Munna Rai son of Shri Rama Kant Rai, resident of Village Bodarhi, P.S.- Dawath, District- Rohtas. ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Prashant Kumar, Adv. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Rishi Raj Sinha (SC-19) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MOHIT KUMAR SHAH ORAL ORDER 3 11-07-2025 1. At the outset, the learned counsel for the opposite parties submits that in compliance of the order dated 16.07.2019, passed in C.W.J.C. No.24117 of 2018, the Circle Officer, Dawath, Rohtas has already passed the final order dated 26.12.2022 in Miscellaneous Case No.01 of 2022-23, whereby Patna High Court MJC No.1810 of 2022(3) dt.11-07-2025 2/2 and whereunder he has concluded that the land in question is raiyati land, hence in case the parties are having any dispute, they may approach the competent Civil Court having appropriate jurisdiction. 2. In view of the aforesaid, the learned counsel for the petitioner seeks liberty on behalf of the petitioner to avail such remedies as are otherwise available under the law, for agitating his subsisting grievances. Liberty so sought is granted. 3. The petition stands disposed off. sonal/- (Mohit Kumar Shah, J) U