Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 64432 (ALL)

MADHU BHATNAGAR v. STATE OF UP AND 2 OTHERS

WRIA/7709/2025 · 2025-05-27

Saurabh Shyam Shamshery

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:91029 Court No. - 6 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 7709 of 2025 Petitioner :- Madhu Bhatnagar Respondent :- State Of Up And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Deepak Kumar Srivastava Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Girijesh Kumar Tripathi Hon'ble Saurabh Shyam Shamshery,J. 1. Heard Sri D.K. Srivastava, learned counsel for petitioner, learned Standing Counsel for State and Sri G.K. Tripathi, learned counsel for respondents. 2. Petitioner ought to have been satisfied that within a very short period of four months, her GPF amount of Rs. 32,00,000/- was paid, therefore, prayer to pay interest of 4 months is not a reasonable prayer. 3. Otherwise also, it is not on record whether between said period, there was any communication about demanding papers. 4. Considering aforesaid circumstances, prayer made in this writ petition of paying interest for 4 months is not sustainable. 5. Accordingly, writ petition lacks merit, hence, dismissed. Order Date :- 28.5.2025 N. Sinha Digitally signed by :- NIRMAL SINHA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad