PURSHOTTAM PANDURANG INGLE v. STATE OF MAHARASHTRA, THR. SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF WATER SUPPLY AND SANITATION AND ORS.
CAO/1139/2025 · 2025-11-25
Shri Prafulla S Khubalkar
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 64428 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 64428 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1 ca 1139.25.odt IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR CAO No.1139/2025 in MCA St. No.18778/2025 in Writ Petition st No.25474/2024 (R) Purushottam V State of Maharashtra and others - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ------------------------- Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ---------------------------- Mr. A.P. Gase, Advocate for applicant/petitioner.
CORAM : PRAFULLA S. KHUBALKAR
, J.
DATE : 25-11-2025. Heard.
2. This is an application for condonation of delay in filing the application for restoration of the writ petition of which registration is refused for non removal of office objections. It is submitted that there is a delay of 57 days in filing the application for restoration which occurred since the petitioner was not aware about the dismissal order. It is submitted that the delay is unintentional and the same be condoned.
3. Having regard to the contents of the application and
submissions advanced, delay of 57 days in filing the application for restoration is condoned, subject to costs of Rs. 3000/- to be paid by the petitioner to the Government Pleader’s office library, High Court, Bench at Nagpur within two weeks from today.
4. Application is allowed and disposed of.
MCA St. No.18778/2025 Heard.
2. This is an application for restoration of the writ petition of which registration was refused for non removal of office objections by
order dated 20-04-2025. Learned Counsel for the applicant submits that
2 ca 1139.25.odt he wants to contest the petition on merits and prays for restoration of the petition.
3. Having regard to the contents of the application, application is allowed.
4. Petitioner is directed to remove the office objections within two weeks from today. (Prafulla S. Khubalkar
, J. ) Deshmukh