Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 6442 (UTT)

SURAJ SINGH NEGI AND ANR v. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND

C528/630/2025 · 2025-05-15

Vivek Bharti Sharma

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

SL. No Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS 15.05.2025 C528 No.630 of 2025 Hon’ble Vivek Bharti Sharma, J. Mr. D.S. Mehta, learned counsel for the petitioners. 2. Mr. Akshay Latwal, learned Assistant Government Advocate along with Mr. Prabhat Kandpal, learned Brief Holder for the State. 3. Learned counsel for the State would submit that remedy of filing revision against the impugned order is available to the petitioner/accused. 4. To this, learned counsel for the petitioner/accused seeks permission to withdraw the present petition with liberty to file appropriate revision, as per law. 5. In view of the above submissions of learned counsel for the parties, the present C528 petition is disposed of with the direction to learned counsel for the petitioner to seek appropriate remedy, as per law. (Vivek Bharti Sharma, J.) 15.05.2025 SS