Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Himachal Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 6442 (HP)

PIYUSH VERMA v. STATE OF HP

CRMP/371/2025 · 2025-01-28

Rakesh Kainthla

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Piyush Verma vs. State of H.P. Cr.M.P. No. 371 of 2025 in Cr.MP(M) No. 2190 of 2024 28.01.2025 Present: Mr. Pankaj Negi, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Manoj Chauhan, Additional Advocate General, for the respondent-State. Status report has been filed. Heard. The applicant has filed the present application seeking permission to go abroad w.e.f. 30.10.2025 to 03.02.2025. Perusal of the record shows that the Court had granted permission to the applicant earlier to go abroad w.e.f. 28.12.2024 till 31.12.2024 and 04.01.2025 till 07.01.2025. It has not been asserted that the applicant had not returned to India after availing such permission from the Court. Keeping in view the fact that the permission to travel abroad was granted to the applicant by the Court earlier which was not misused by him, therefore, the present application is allowed and the applicant is permitted to go abroad w.e.f. 30.01.2025 till 03.02.2025, subject to furnishing of personal and surety bonds in the sum of ₹2,00,000/- each to the satisfaction of learned Additional/Deputy Registrar (Judicial)/learned Trial Court within two days, with an undertaking to return India after completion of his journey on 03.02.2025. He shall furnish the details with regard to flight, boarding and lodging to the concerned police station within a period of three days from today. He shall also report to the concerned police after his return on 04.02.2025. Application stands disposed of. (Rakesh Kainthla) Vacation Judge 28th January,2025 (Nikita)